By Perry E. Gresham – 1988
Italics mine – Frank Trejo – Yesterday’s News Today
Liberty is constantly under attack. Legislators, planners, and bureaucrats take away one freedom after another and feel very self-righteous about it. The right to hold onto to our money has been abridged by taxation; the right to deliver mail is monopolized by government; and the right to manage one’s own business is severely restrained.
The big shock, however, is in a new proposal to limit the life extending medical service provided to people over 80. Thomas Jefferson, where are you now? You thought the right to life was self-evident. The elderly comprise the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. population. Some think-tankers are horrified that old people will take over, if not all the power, at least most of the services, and health care costs will continue to escalate. Daniel Callahan, author of Setting Limits, thinks he has the perfect answer – let everyone over 80 die. (There are countries that abandon those 65 and over.)
In his book, Callahan mulls over the alternatives for dealing with the gray avalanche, and he concludes that fourscore is long enough to live; thereafter, medical care should be limited to those measures that provide only comfort to the patient. (A dozen Viagra pills and a six-pack.) Medicare payments should be restricted to mere palliatives after age 80. Private medical insurance payments on the part of a patient should be forbidden, since that would be wasting money to extend life spans, and age affords the fairest, most appealing method of solving a large problem – the ultimate death of the elderly.
This man is serious! He’s also misguided. He assumes, incorrectly, that the government is the custodian of all old people. Most of us, however, are perfectly capable of caring for ourselves. Before we turn over the job of caring for the elderly to government, we should ask ourselves just how well government manages other things. The postal Service cannot fire the incompetent, close unneeded offices, or deliver mail on time. Amtrak is a study in wasteful, inefficient management. (Now we are in the car business)
When the government provides funds for health care, the costs rise. Patients request more; doctors charge more; lawyers sue more. Meanwhile, the public pays the tab. (Wait until this new administration introduces a socialist health plan – named after the ultra-liberal-non-swimmer Ted Kennedy. Chances look good that it will pass. The Republicans have been destroyed by Bush and the likes of McCain in the GOP and there will be small opposition.)
But the high cost of medical care for the elderly is not caused by our numbers; it’s caused by needlessly expensive medical bills. If we were to cut off life support for those over 80, the costs of medicine would still increase. The right to life is, in the words of Jefferson, endowed by our creator; it’s not an agreement by consensus among social scientists, planners, politicians and bureaucrats. Life and death are individual matters – a transaction between each individual and Almighty God.
This age of endless government intervention has blurred the meaning of the individual to the extent that the far out ethicists deny the very significance of individuality. As Callahan writes in Setting Limits: “Individualism should, in sum, give way to a community-based and affirmed notion of the value of the aged in society and, with that, an acceptance of limits to health care for the aged and medical research to benefit them.” By limits, he means pulling the plug at age 80.
If the social technocrats really wish to help society in this regard, the issue is what to do about those of us, young or old, who wish to die; who are worthless to themselves and society, mere vegetables kept alive by social conventions that prohibit the suffering person from exercising the right to die. (Call Dr. Kevorkian – collect call)
To lump all old people together, however, is to waste some of the best years of some of the best talent. The young managers of other people’s lives cannot know the inner damage of this octogenarian death wish. We lose self-esteem when we think of ourselves as obsolete and “in the way,” The inner splendor of healthy, vital old age is a well-earned joy not to be treated as unimportant. To love and be loved in old age is a major benefit to humankind. Grand-parenting after 80 can be of vast benefit to the oncoming generation. Wisdom is a rare quality, one which is often characteristic of old age.
Callahan’s suggestion that old people teach the young to die gladly after 80 years is a “lemming” philosophy unlikely to be practiced by the old, or believed by the young. The will to live is the basic drive of virtually every living organism. No ethical consensus can repeal the élan (impetuous ardor) of nature.
Those who think and work in the field of social thought, public policy, human problems, and gerontology (aging problems) would do well to abandon the collectivist assumptions of an authoritarian society and rediscover the individual who fights a hard fight for life. We are individuals with the individual right to live or die. God is our judge, not the think-tankers.
Give us a fair field for our struggle to live, and we shall, with our amazing resourcefulness, come up with some successful solutions that will astound the social scientist. We, with a free hand, can more readily control costs. In most circumstances, we can help ourselves and each other in such a manner that the huge appropriations for health entitlements will be unnecessary.
People past the age of 80 are still children of God, worthy of the same respect and consideration as those of any other group…end of article.
Perry Gresham is President Emeritus and distinguished professor at Bethany College in West Virginia.
By Charlie Reese – 1988
Italics mine – Frank Trejo
One of the several reasons why people should vote incumbent congressmen out of office this year is that virtually none of them seriously oppose the annual foreign aid giveaways. No, they should be thrown out because they violate the law of the land – your U.S. Constitution.
The foreign welfare program costs four times as much as we are spending on the Strategic Defense Initiative. Furthermore, it is clearly unconstitutional, though for all practical purposes, we no longer have constitutional government. Judicial activists have decided the Constitution means whatever they choose to say it means. That is the same as saying it means nothing.
Nevertheless, you can read the entire Constitution (you’ll find it on this website) and not find a word in it that would even imply the authority of the Congress to tax the American people and give the money to foreign countries. Foreign aid has become a mindless ritual whereby money goes – willy-nilly – to allies, enemies, and to nations which by no stretch of the imagination are in need of charity from overtaxed Americans. (It’s been reported that $50 billion of your money is not accounted for in Iraq)
One example cited by a Heritage Foundation study is that Ecuador, which is friendly, got $22 million one year while Mozambique, which is a hostile Soviet client state, received $35 million. Some of the rich oil states of the Persian Gulf have received aid for such things as sewer plants and agricultural irrigation.
The State Department and a number of private organizations, including some multi-national corporations, are the chief proponents of foreign aid, which Congress these days treats as a non-controversial item. An item that costs taxpayers $15 billion a year.
The only legitimate purpose, supplying arms to an ally to further our self-defense, could be accomplished in a legitimate manner. It is stupid to tax Americans, give the money to a foreign government that then purchases arms from American manufacturers. (It is not stupid – it is criminal. The arm merchants are supplying terrorists with armaments that are killing our men/women in uniform. This is treason condone by the criminals in all three branches of government. Where is the outcry from organizations such as the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Vets for Freedom, and all other organizations that represent our GI’s? You veterans – your defense of our country didn’t end with your discharge papers… do something again for your country – get involved.)
Let our own Defense Department purchase the arms and then lease them to allies or barter them for bases or some other asset we need. (What then, when these arms still end up in terrorists hands? Some on radio have reported part of foreign aid to the Middle Eastern countries are channeled to Hamas and other scoundrels, killing our GI’s)
Of course there are indeed few allies of the U.S. in existence, despite claims to the contrary. It is no ally that demands bribes for bases, the purpose of which is to defend them in the first place. We should tell the Philippines, Greece, Turkey, Spain and Portugal to either give us $1 a year leases for our bases in those countries or they can defend themselves without assistance or intervention from the United States. (Folks. All this is to spend, spend and spend. The more the criminals spend the more money the owners of the Fed make. Why else would we be there for? Protect them from what? There are roughly 500,000 GI’s scattered throughout the world and we can’t even patrol our borders? Billions upon billions is spent and yet many families are forced to send product to their sons and daughters that government should be supplying. The Walter Reed Hospital scandal discovered squalor conditions our sons/daughters, coming home from war, were subjected to. We have criminals running government.) The benefit to a local economy from a major military installation is reward enough for the host country.
We should also elect a Congress that would end our participation in international development banks. Here again, the American people are taxed to provide for their own defense, and then taxed again for contributions to these international agencies to provide money to our enemies.
Rumania, which is a Stalinist dictatorship in the Soviet camp, has received $342 million in loans from U.S. agencies, $1.8 billion from the World Bank (one world government) $23 million from the United Nations Development Program, and $28 million in loan guarantees from the Export-Import Bank. (Keep in mind that these banking entities are connected one way or another to the same people that own the Fed. Awesome, isn’t it? You know what’s awesome? We have more power than them – collectively – we just don’t know it.)
Not only is Congress taxing Americans to send money to their enemies, but it is also taxing Americans to provide funds for economic competitors whose products compete with ours in the world marketplace. Thus, we are being taxed to hurt our own economy and to contribute to the decline of our own standard of living. (This happened because Congress destroyed our Industrial Base by over-regulating and taxing the shit out of our companies, forcing them overseas, and allowed foreign made products (slave labor) to smother whatever remains. The Bankers hate the middle-class and their agenda is to reduce our country to a third-world status. And that’s why we have criminals running OUR three branches of government. Do you think these servants are stupid?
All of these billions taken from Americans and distributed overseas have bought us nothing – not friendship, not allies, not stability, not a more “democratic” world. On the contrary, it has contributed to advancement of our enemies, subsidized socialist boondoggles, engendered hostility, and made us an object of contempt. Nobody has any respect for a sucker…end of article
This article was written in 1988. I could’ve researched and brought this type of info more up to date – what for? You can bet its bigger now. And to think that your Constitution doesn’t authorize foreign aid. Someone told me long ago that the presidency was worth over a $100 million. I didn’t understand then – because I was ignorant of kickbacks.
“I’M SORRY I HAVE BUT ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY” where’s yours?
By Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. – 1987
The italics are mine – Frank Trejo
The Federal Reserve System, a federally chartered, privately owned corporation, is widely known to be the instrumentality used by the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission to develop the New World, socialistic order they desire to reduce to reality. (These two devious schemes are inventions of the Rockefellers – one of the owners of the Federal Reserve)
The Fed operates on the expenditure side of the federal government as its principal banker, supplying the federal government with the funds needed to finance deficits. The Fed has a vested interest in continued budgetary deficits because it reaps very substantial interest income there from. (tax free) But it also furthers the goals of the New World Order by building the immense government needed to control a socialist United States. (Expanded greatly by the leftist FDR- a lapdog of the bankers)
The Fed will continue its financing of the totalitarian government machinery until it is completed, and then the Fed will cause its creature, the Federal Reserve Note, to collapse and then this will cause social chaos. With the collapse of the American monetary system, the American people will willingly grant the government the totalitarian control it desires. Enter the New World Order.
Many people see a direct connection between the Fed and the IRS and the role these two organizations play in abetting the conspiracy. On the one hand, the Fed constantly inflates the money supply, thus causing all prices – including the prices of wages, salaries and other compensation for labor – to rise. (Because of the bailout by the criminals in Congress you had better get ready for horrendous inflation. It’s been reported that this bailout, coupled with spending by Democrats coming year, the interest on the deficit will be getting close to over 600 billion per year. Some say it’ll be close to a trillion. Get out of debt – throw the credit cards away.)
On the other hand, the IRS with the graduated tax structure (2nd plank commie manifesto) of the federal income tax take more and greater portions of our compensation for labor with the passage of each additional year. These two organizations are obviously working together. Any novice can readily see that this unholy alliance is transferring the great wealth of the American populace to the federal government, or its masters.
Although many people are acutely aware of the private nature of the Fed, the same people readily assume a public nature for the IRS. Public agencies are characterized as being inefficient, unproductive, cumbersome, overly staffed and mismanaged. (The White House has 1500 staff members nowadays) The IRS is efficient, productive, skillfully managed and achieves its organizational goals. These attributes are the characteristics of a private organization. What is the true nature of the IRS? Is it public or private?
It would appear that the answer to this question could be found in an examination of the United States Code. But, an examination of the alphabetical index of the code under the heading Internal Revenue Service reveals nothing but a reference to the heading Internal Revenue, sub-heading Internal Revenue Service, there is no citation to any enabling act establishing the IRS.
In Reorganization Plan number one of 1952, certain changes were made in the Bureau of Internal Revenue, with no mention of the IRS. Since there apparently is no enabling statute authorizing the creation of the Internal Revenue Service – the next inquiry relates to whether the true nature of the IRS is public or private. To determine the true nature of the IRS, we must find how this organization fits into the broad conspiracy picture.
Because the Fed operates on the expenditure side of the federal government, the Fed does not have total and complete control and power of the federal government. (They don’t? then why did we bailout the financial markets?…” he who has the gold makes the rules”)
If the federal government chose not to utilize the services of the Fed, it could rely upon its powers of taxation to make it independent. (…”only Congress can coin money and regulate the value thereof…” – so reads your U.S. Constitution – Art. 1 Sec. 5)
What the conspiracy needs to fully implement its control over the federal government is an organization under the control of the conspirators on the receipts side of the government. (Small wonder the IRS is allowed to trample on our Constitution)
With such an organization, a vast portion of the tax receipts of the government could be collected by this agency for the government. The benefits to the government in utilizing a private collection agency are obvious – the government would not have to deal with the messy problem of investing the tax receipts until expended. But the benefits to this collection agency are even greater. It has the use of a vast fund for investment purposes until needed by the government; it can withhold funds necessary for governmental operation if the government does not obey its dictates and demands.
A private collection agency for the federal government is probably more powerful and influential than the Fed. (Probably? Just ask a federal judge if he pays taxes even though the Constitution directs government not to diminish their pay…”receive for their services a compensation which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” – Art. 111 Sec. 1 U.S. Constitution. Our founding fathers put that in so judges wouldn’t fear anyone. YOU SPINELESS COWARDS!
What really happened in the years between 1950 and 1952? Did Treasury enter into a sweetheart contract with a private organization named Internal Revenue Service allowing this latter organization to collect the revenue from federal income taxes? Does this contract allow the IRS to invest these tax receipts with large New York banks until needed by the government? Does this contract require Treasury to use its vast influence and power to persuade the federal judiciary that the agents of this completely independent private organization are government employees and thus entitled to absolute or qualified immunity for the torts they commit? Is this contract super-secret?
The above questions are the natural conclusions drawn from known facts. We as Americans have every right to obtain answers to these inquiries from our public servants. If the things we fear are true, then we have an obligation to rescue our federal government from the stranglehold of these alien, international powers seeking to implement the New World Order and thus destroy our beloved Constitution. (It’s gone – but we can pretend we still have a chance)
If we do nothing, then surely these aliens surrounding our government will force us into fighting the next world war. And, as we all know, war is the ultimate change agent…end of article.
* * * * *
Guest Writer Larry Becraft is a patriot attorney who had been active in challenging the IRS and the 16th Amendment, has also done extensive research on the illegality of the money system.
I don’t know what to think of this. I flunked 8th grade. I know that no department of government is to be a corporation. This is why the Federal Reserve is not listed in the blue pages of the phone book because it is a private organization. But the IRS is listed. Unless it’s a “super-secret” contract as the writer speculates.
YESTERDAY’S NEWS TODAY
By Jeffery A. Dickstein – 1987
Italic mine – Frank Trejo
Because many patriots, paralegals and attorneys before us have researched the history and law of the U.S. Constitution, we are now in a position to use that information in a historic effort to reclaim our freedom (we are economic slaves). The purpose of this article is to explain, and in some cases just list, some of the many abuses of government that will be addressed in the Golden Mean Team’s First Amendment lawsuit that is currently being prepared. (This organization was dedicated in the fight to restore our lawful government. I don’t know if they still exist.)
We can now conclusively prove that the federal government does not legally administer the income tax. U.S. Supreme Court’s and the government’s own records show conclusively numerous violations of law with respect to the assessment and collection of the federal income tax, and criminal persecutions based upon those taxes.
The government admits that the power to collect income taxes is derived from the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
However, we have proven conclusively that the 16th was not ratified by the people of the country. The Secretary of State at the time knew this, but nonetheless certified the amendment as passed. This means that the government has no lawful power to collect the income tax under the law. (Earlier articles on this website addresses this) We have brought this to the attention of every branch of the government, each of which refused to talk to us. (taxation without representation – bastards!)
Also, the income tax was never intended to apply to your wages. Your wages are property which cannot be taxed except through the constitutional rule of apportionment. The income tax is not collected through apportionment, and the current administration of the income tax is unconstitutional (It’s administered under the 2nd and 10th Plank of the Communist Manifesto – that is a fact!)
The IRS and the courts actually impose heavy fines for addressing this issue. The Tax Protester program of the IRS was specifically designed to target Americans exercising their inherent right to protest the illegal collection of taxes. Hundreds of Americans citizens who challenged this unconstitutional tax collection system are being held as political prisoners.
As a federal agency, the IRS has no legal power to make laws or to impose fines and penalties. Due Process requires a court hearing. However, the IRS imposes fines and penalties, and the courts refuse any attempt to obtain a court hearing. (This was one of the worst fears our founding fathers had – the subversion of the three branches of government. All this to protect the owners of the Federal Reserve – a pvt. corporation)
The U.S. Tax Court violates its own rules by refusing to allow taxpayer’s to find out the nature of the government’s contention that taxes are owed, but yet the law requires the taxpayer to prove the government’s position is wrong.
It’s impossible to fill out a Form 1040 income tax return without waving constitutionally protected rights. Judge Learned Hand specifically recognized this, but still held that tax returns must be filled out. The IRS creates false documents to be used in court cases, and agents are trained to lie on the stand. (Communism, anyone?) The IRS’ computer is specifically programmed not to accept documents that could be used as evidence against the IRS in court.
No statute exists making any citizens who earns income in the U.S. liable for any income tax. (Your Constitution reads that there are only two ways to tax wages direct. In time of war, to pay for it, but is to be repealed after the war. The other way is through apportionment by the States. The 16th Amendment is an indirect excise tax but it’s worded to confuse our people.)
The government plants agents on the jury for criminal tax trial proceedings. Jurors are not told they have the right to disagree with the judge’s interpretation of the law. The IRS has no legal authority to issue search warrants, and illegally produces evidence to obtain criminal convictions. Federal persecutors all illegally issue grand jury subpoenas to accomplish the same purpose.
Citizens have been entirely cut off from filing complaints with the grand jury – making it impossible to file criminal complaints against government employees. Immunity statutes also protect government employees from going to court in civil cases against them. Government agents plotted against and killed Gordon Kahl, a well known advocate for legal taxes, and then burned down a house to effectuate a Watergate type cover-up. (In the future you’ll read articles of this criminal act) The IRS took control of a nursery school, and held the children hostage until ransom for the children’s release was paid by their parents.
The government lied to you about the Social Security program, and is embezzling your retirement money. (It’s a known fact that there isn’t any money in the fund…it’s all bullshit!
The government treats any correspondence regarding the validity of IRS administration of the taxes as criminal activity, and the procedure for an immediate criminal investigation is automatically triggered. Official records of assessment of taxes are not recorded. The IRS does not file returns they are required by law to file. Federal Judges are under the control of the IRS, thereby destroying our constitutional form of government. (Under the Constitution judges’ salaries shall not be diminished as long as they are judges – but they are – taxed. How deep the control is.) IRS personnel and the government persecutor receive bonus payments for obtaining convictions in tax cases.
Most Americans willingly pay all the taxes they are legally required to pay. The federal excise tax on gasoline is a legal tax, and the proceeds are used to pay for the highways. The stamp tax used by the post office is a legal tax, the proceeds of which run the postal system. (I’ve read that the postal service runs in the red over a billion dollars per year. It’s one of the biggest unions in our country and their lobbyists are some of the most powerful ones in Washington. Many have tried privatizing it – it’ll never happen.)
So too, import taxes are legal taxes which we pay when we buy a foreign car. We pay 129 separate taxes on a loaf of bread. (The sales tax is another example…all these come under the 16th Amendment but not wages on your labor. The Supreme Court defines “income” as profit and gain…your labor is neither.) In truth, the income tax only accounts for approximately 30 percent of all taxes collected.
Because of the efforts of over 20 million government branded tax protesters, a few members of Congress are trying to help. But when former Congressman George Hansen tried to help, he was convicted, kidnapped by federal marshals and imprisoned under a false name. (This story you’ll read about soon)
The simple of fact is, we have had enough of this abuse. The First Amendment absolutely guarantees us, the people, the right to correct government abuse. History has shown it doesn’t matter who the men in office are, or the political party in control, the abuse continues. (The Democrat and Republican two-party system has destroyed our Constitution. They are the ones responsible for the financial disaster that is costing taxpayers trillions. We need a mechanism whereas we can impeach these criminals apart from the three corrupted branches. I have the answer, I’ll share soon.)
It is time to stand up once and for all, and demand the restoration of the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. A nationwide, First Amendment lawsuit, if supported by the people, can restore honesty in government and financial prosperity to us all.
The Constitution was adopted by our founding fathers after a revolution to ensure that government did not steal and lot from us a King George stole from the people through taxation. Let’s show the people of the world that our form of government is the best, one in which government employees take orders from the people. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people…end of article
Guest Writer of the Justice Times, Jeffery Dickstein is an Alaskan patriot attorney who worked with super-star paralegal Peggy Christiansen of Missoula Montana. They both represented the Golden Mean Team back in the 80s.
Back in the 70s I was a “tax rebel” just like the early colonists that sent the King packing. I didn’t make enough waves to draw attention from the KGB. But you can almost guarantee this time I will. “I regret I have only one bat to swing for my country!” Where’s yours?
YESTERDAY’S NEWS TODAY
“Constitutional rights may not be denied simply because of hostility to their assertion of exercise.” Cox v. Louisiana, (1965) 379 U.S. 536.
Italics are mine – Frank Trejo
There have been occasional court orders, prohibiting the speaking out against the present tax system, over a period of these last fifteen years, in cases where criminal convictions have been involved. However, such court orders, come under the doctrine of “prior restraint”, which is, the practice of censoring speech, before it’s spoken, a definite, legal ‘no-no’.
In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a person’s objection to a state ‘motto’ (live free or die), on their license plate, could be obscured, since the car owner didn’t agree with that motto. It held that government of an ideological point of view with which he disagrees. Wooley v Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977)
In this writer’s view, the Wooley case is applicable to the present cases of prior restraint, which involves speaking and writing against the federal income tax. People cannot be forced to agree with the bureaucrats, as to its application. If a person disagrees with the way in which the law is being administered, one has the right to say so, without the intimidation of ‘government’, through court orders not to talk against said tax, by revealing illegal administration of the tax laws and the subsequent constitutional, infringements, which are the natural consequence of massive federal violations.
We are further reminded by the Court …”Mere public intolerance or animosity CANNOT be the basis for abridgement of (First Amendment) freedoms.”
Coates v. Cincinnati (1971) 402 U.S. 611
If public animosity cannot be the basis for such abridgement, how much less can federal animosity provide such a basis? Prior restraint of speech or press is censorship and there is a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity, in the higher courts. Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931) and Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963)
The rare exceptional cases where prior restraint is allowed, involve military information being made public in time of war, speech which is likely to incite violence, political speeches on military reservations and certain types of obscene publications. It is simply not applicable to disagreements over government policies, even those involving taxes.
Further, in cases of prior restraint, the burden of proof is NOT on the censored party but on the adverse party. Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931)
The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed in 1970, that individuals cannot be convicted “simply because they advocated unpopular ideas”. To deprive a person of his liberty, it is not sufficient to prove that his views were offensive to some of his listeners. Bachellar v. Maryland, (1970), 397 U.S. 564. The principle involved here, would seem equally applicable to government. Also the same court held that:
“The Fourteenth Amendment does not permit a state to make criminal, the peaceful expression of unpopular views. Henry v. Rock Hill, (1964) 376 U.S. 776
Amendment 14 Sec. 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
This 14th Amendment has been twisted by the pro-illegal forces. They claim that the word “person” applies to all people. The key word in the Amendment is “jurisdiction”. Illegal aliens are not in the “jurisdiction” of our laws. How can the 14th apply to non-citizens? Liberals (socialists/communist) in our country have many people convinced that illegals are protected by the 14th. Don’t allow them and politicians (especially Democrats) to bull-shit you.
Following that decision, the next year the Court held, in a case about a breach-of-peace-statute, which made it unlawful “to agitate, to arouse from a state of repose, to molest, to interrupt, to hinder, to disquiet” by public utterances, that
“The statute is unconstitutional, in that it sweeps within its broad scope, activities that are constitutionally protected free speech and assembly. Maintenance of the opportunity for free political discussion is basic tenet of our democracy.” Cox, supra. (Note: the author of that opinion obviously has succumbed to the propaganda that this is a democracy, when it is in truth, a republic, to which the Founding Fathers have testified.)
While the above decisions involve the Fourteenth Amendment and state laws, they are equally applicable to the federal government under the First Amendment. Perhaps Justice Douglas said it best in his opinion in the Terminiello decision. He wrote:
‘The vitality of civil and political institutions in our society depends on free discussion…it is only through free debate and free exchange of ideas that government remains RESPONSIVE to the will of the people and PEACEFUL change is effected. The right to speak freely and to promote DIVERSITY of ideas and programs is therefore one of the chief distinctions that set us apart from totalitarian regimes.
Accordingly, a function of free speech under our system is to INVITE dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have PROFOUND unsettling effects, as it presses for acceptance of an idea. That is why speech, though not absolute, is nevertheless protected against CENSORSHIP or punishment, unless shown likely to produce a clear and present danger of a SUBSTANTIVE evil that arises Far above public inconvenience, annoyance or unrest.”
Terminiello v. Chicago, (1949) 337 U.S. 1
Please note that in all cases, the Courts were talking about the danger to the people, NOT to Washington bureaucrats such as tax collectors and federal judges. Besides, telling the truth about income tax could hardly lead to ‘public inconvenience’.
To attempt to silence patriots (tax protestors) convicted on federal tax ‘crimes’, comes dangerously close to the Sedition Act of July 14, 1798 Wherein the people were forbidden to, “oppose any measure or measures of the government of the United States…or cause to procure or to be written, printed, uttered or published, or assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any writings against the government of the United States…or to excite against them…the hatred of the good people of the United States…” or whoever would attempt to”…resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act,” would be punish.
It was against such tyrannical law, that Jefferson wrote the Kentucky Resolution (Nov 1798) and Madison followed with the Virginia Resolution (Dec. 1798) which resulted in the Congress rescinding The Sedition Act. (If only we had such patriots in our government instead of criminals)
Any such Court Order restricting speech or publishing of material, which is displeasing to our public servants, is a blatant violation of our basic law in both letter and spirit. Such Court Orders must be VIGOROUSLY appealed and should be widely circulated, published and openly discussed. They cannot be allowed to stand…end of article
* * * * *
All throughout 60s – 70s – 80s and 90s this great American (Claire Kelley) wrote such articles. If ever we were to rid ourselves of the socialists/communists and return our country to a Constitutional Republic I would recommend her face be sculptured along the other great Americans on Mt. Rushmore. What an authentic hero. I hope I run into you in heaven.
Italics mine – Frank Trejo
At a fundraiser in Jacksonville, Florida, Senator Barack Obama displayed his hypocrisy when he played the race card against Republicans, while whining that he expects Republicans to play the race card against him. This dishonest tactic is straight out of the Democratic Party’s political playbook. (Communists tactics)
Since Obama wants the American people to believe he is disgusted by racism we call upon Obama to condemn his fellow Democrats for their Jim Crow-style racist attacks against black Republicans because we do not adhere to the Democratic Party’s liberal agenda. More specifically, we ask Obama to condemn Democrat Senator Joe Biden who boasted proudly on FOX News that his qualification to be President was enhanced because his home state of Delaware held blacks in human bondage. “You don’t know my state,” Biden crowed, “my state was a slave state.” Imagine the media firestorm that would have ensued if a Republican had uttered such an outrageously racist comment.
We request that Obama denounce Democrat Sen. Ted Kennedy (non-swimmer) who called black Republican judicial nominees, including Justice Janice Rogers Brown, “Neanderthals.”
We ask Obama to condemn Democrat Sen. Harry Reid who appeared on Meet the Press and attacked black Republican Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, demeaning the justice as an incompetent negro, incapable of writing good English. “Slap at Thomas sticks of racism,” was the headline of the New York Daily News’ December 7, 2004 editorial.
We request that Obama denounce the Democrats who threw Oreo cookies (black on the outside and white on the inside) onto the stage during an appearance of Maryland’s former Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele when he was seeking a seat in Congress.
We ask Obama to condemn the Democrat bloggers who posted a doctored photo of Michael Steele on the Internet, depicting him as a “Simple Sambo” with a Jim Crow-era “black face,” nappy hair and thick red lips.
We request that Obama denounce the two members of the Democratic Senatorial Committee (DSCC) who resigned in September 2005 after admitting they illegally obtained Michael Steele’s credit report in a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a federal offense. The two culprits were Katie Barge, the DSCC’S research director who pled guilty to a misdemeanor. And her deputy, Lauren Weiner.
We ask Obama to condemn the Democrat talk show hosts and cartoonists who denigrated Dr. Condoleezza Rice after she was nominated to be the first black woman secretary of state. Democrat Pat Oliphant drew Dr. Rice as a big-lipped, buck-toothed squawking parrot, smearing her as an empty-headed stooge. Democrat Jeff Danzinger depicted Dr. Rice as a stereotyped “mammy,” barefoot and ignorant. Democrat Ted Rall referred to Dr. Rice as President’s Bush “House [N-word]”. Democrat John Sylvester characterized Dr. Rice on his radio talk show as a stupid, servile black woman, calling her an “Aunt Jemima”.
We request that Obama denounce Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd, a former “Keagle” in the Klu Klux Klan, who led other Democrats, including Sen. John Kerry and Barbara Boxer, in a filibuster of Dr. Rice’s confirmation when she appeared before the Senate for her confirmation hearing.
We ask Obama to apologize for writing a letter in support of former Klansman Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd, considering the following facts about Byrd.
-In 2001, Byrd was forced to apologize for using the N-word on television
-Byrd pushed to have the Senate’s main office building named after Democrat Richard Russell, Byrd’s mentor and leading opponent of anti-lynching legislation.
-Byrd, along with Democrat Senators Sam Ervin and Albert Gore, Sr., was a chief opponent of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and filibustered against the bill for 14 straight hours before the final vote.
- Byrd, along with other racist Democrats, smeared Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during the 1960’s. This racist attack on Dr. King was ongoing when Democrat President JFK had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a communist in order to undermine Dr. King. The relentless disparagement of Dr. King by Democrats led to his being physically assaulted and ultimately to his tragic death. In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King’s leaving Memphis, Tennessee after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Byrd called Dr. King a “trouble maker” who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.
We request that Obama apologize to all black Americans for the Democratic Party’s 200-year history of racism against all black Americans as exposed in the books “Unfounded Loyalty” by Rev. Wayne Perryman and “A Short History of Reconstruction” by Dr. Eric Foner.
We ask Obama to embrace the 2006 report by the Commission appointed by North Carolina’s governor which uncovered facts that prompted the Democratic Party of North Carolina to pass a unanimous resolution apologizing for the Democratic Party’s role in the bloody 1898 Wilmington Race Riots where dozens of black Americans were massacred. That Apology is on the Internet at: http://www.ncdp.org/nodp/1546. In a letter to the North Carolina Democratic Party, Lt. Governor Richard H. Moore wrote: “We can no longer ignore the fact that many of us grew up being taught a much sanitized – and inaccurate – History…. The truth is ugly.”
If Obama refuses to condemn the Democrats for their racist past and current race-baiting against black Republicans, then what right does Obama have to preemptively accuse Republicans of using racism against him?
Submitted by Frances Rice, chairman of the National Black Republican Association. She may be contacted at www.NBRA.info.
How nice of Francis Rice to allow me to use articles from her website. Please make time to familiarize yourselves with truthful stories of our black brothers who have contributed so much to our country. The leaders of the Democratic Party are the real racists in the Congress. Democrats in the Democratic Party should throw out these hypocrites.
The website address of the National Black Republican Association is: http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com.
Italics are mine – Frank Trejo
I have a dream. My dream is that come the 1990s or the early 2000s I will be known as a gloom and doom old fool with a habit of soothsaying the demise of the United States as a sanctuary for freedom. I hope to be told in smart-alecky terms that back in the 1980s I predicted a disaster, but here it is 1989 (or 1992, or 2001) already and the country remains the great land of the free, the Constitution unscathed, our liberties secure. You’re an insane, pessimistic old goat. Get back in the barn and do your raving where the only things you’ll frighten are the horses.” That will make me very happy.
I prefer such a future over becoming an honored and respected elder being told in hushed voices in a mountain hideaway or an underground shelter – with a constant eye for secreted listening devices – that “we should have listened to you in 1986. You were right. Oh, how you were right!”
Or more likely I would be honored in memory only, having been one of the early slaughtered. Those of us who foresee the disaster of tyranny, or a people’s revolution trying to hold back that tyranny, can never win. If our alarm is not heard we and the progeny we love will be enslaved; if it is heard, and the tyranny is stemmed, we will be condemned and maligned for how could it ever be known that our sounding the alarm was the cause.
Would we show any respect today for the pessimists of 1931 and 1932 if the German people had listened to warnings about a nasty, mustached, power-mad, corporal and his brown shirted punks and that hate-filled book of his? Of course, not.
The only historical record would be foot notes. No one having been slaughtered, no need for holocaust memorials. Those gloom and doomsayers would be condemned nuts.
But oh how much happier a world history of the 1930s. Nor what can we know of the disaster of 1964 in America, or in 1972 in Canada, or in 1956 Great Britain because, for whatever reason, there was none.
There are always omens, and the futility of our position is we can never be certain which disasters they might foreshadow if we have read them correctly and acted. I am, nonetheless an optimist. I believe that the despotism that can be foretold in the events of today will not occur because enough American people will heed them and forestall it.
My chief purpose for writing this column in The Justice Times is to keep vigorous the grandest bulwark of the people’s liberty ever conceived: trials by independent juries. I hope to show how this often downgraded, shunned, neglected, abused, (by socialists/communist) and ancient invention is the most marvelous device ever conceived for advancing and securing the people’s liberties.
Sometimes bumbling, cumbersome, gangly; always a nuisance to those obliged to serve; unpredictable and defying analysis, the jury – when it is a true jury – and its antecedents has stood above any other institution to defend the people against their oppressors.
I hope to show that where there appear to have been breakdowns it was not from any fault with the institution itself; it was from not being alert, or from neglect. I cannot tell why this is so. (I can. This is what socialism does to a society) I know it only empirically.
I know it from studying the historical record. The tragedy is that authoritarian governments and would be authoritarians know this better than the people, so that where the jury has not been abolished, it has been reduced to a virtual nullity. We have reached a period when the American would-be despotism, realizing the independent jury as its principle obstacle, is making fools of us by deceiving us to believe it is an antiquated imposition on our pursuits of happiness and is of negative value. It is embarked on a savage campaign to alienate us so we will ally ourselves with the enemies of our liberty.
We do not have to cooperate actively with this enemy; we need only show unquestioning disinterest. We need only look the other way.
The intention of our founding parents – understanding the jury better than do we – was to guarantee it inviolate forever, secured to everyone. They devoted more space to trial by jury in the Constitution than any other right. Yet it was impossible to control the passion of our late 20th century despots – primarily judges – to reduce juries to automated panels returning verdicts computerized into them.
Succeeding columns will consider how the courts try to control jury composition, suppress vital testimony, reduce jury size, deny jury trials, violate jury privacy, intimidate jurors and degrade service, and most importantly superimpose their will over the jurors by withholding knowledge of their ultimate defense against despotism: jury nullification. ( it is your fundamental right to nullify any law you thinkl is not right.)
I will discuss these from our views as jurors and as litigants appealing to juries, to show how we allow ourselves to be trapped into going along with the system and contributing to our own destruction.
Godfrey Lehman – considered the world’s expert on the jury system – wrote the article in 1986
“ The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of our Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice. I have no fear of constitutional amendments properly adopted, but I do fear the rewriting of the Constitution by judges under the guise of interpretation.” (-Justice Hugo Black 1968)
TRIAL OF WILLIAM PENN IN 1670 ESTABLISHED THE POWER OF THE JURY
Italics are mine – Frank Trejo
It looks like an overdraft notice from the bank or a W-2 from your employer (lapdog of the IRS). It comes in a grayish envelope that cannot be opened, and when you hold here firmly and pull it – it does not rip apart. The smudgy computer message inside orders you to report to City Hall Room 111 for jury duty, under penalty of law.
The summons looks ordinary, but the power it gives each citizen who receives it is extraordinary, the legacy, ironically, of a criminal defendant.
The accused was 26 years old, son of a famous father, heir of a wealthy family. The charge was disturbing the peace. The old men who passed their days in the courthouse, watching trials, sensed a cover charge, one used to cover an arrest for something offensive that does not happen to be against the law. There had been a public protest, but no one had been hurt, and it is always likely that wealthy disturbers of the peace have in fact disturbed something else.
As the defendant entered court, a deputy snatched off his hat. The judge ordered it put back—then summarily fined the defendant for wearing a hat in court.
The indictment was read and the defendant requested a copy. The judge, a former prosecutor, refused. The defendant, representing himself, pleaded not guilty. The jury was sworn.
City Hall Room 111 has one American Flag, five televisions, four newspaper boxes, a battery of coffee and snack vending machines, a rack of mostly old magazines and a couple hundred plastic chairs in miscellaneous colors. It is the Jury Assembly Room, a room designed for waiting.
Selected at random from voter registration lists, the people who fill Room 111 each morning are generally strangers to each other, making a quiet crowd, as the day passes, names are called and jurors are organized into pools, then escorted to courtrooms, where some are selected for trials after voir dire. (kinda like testing the potential juror as to his honesty – an oath) This process is where the court allows the system to corrupt. Later I will reprint articles explaining how this happens. The others return to Room 111 to await a second chance. The summons specifies one day or one trial, and at the end of the day, those not held over for trial are released and paid.
More than 600 years old, trial by jury is today a distinctly American exercise. Art 111 of the Constitution guarantees juries in all criminal cases, and roughly 90 percent of all jury trials in the world occur in the United States. The requirement, unquestionably inefficient, that 12 persons return a unanimous verdict on guilt or innocence endures because of the democratic suspicion that law is too important to be left to lawyers and judges. (Amen)
And the sometimes breathtaking power of the citizens who assemble each morning in Room 111 – and in hundreds of other jury rooms – endures because of the defendant who wore his hat into court.
By the time his case went to the jury, the outcome seemed certain. Witnesses had put the defendant in a stormy public protest and even if his actions were technically defensible, the no-nonsense judge did not free protestors on technicalities. The judge had made his reputation taking charge, which he did in mid-trial when the defendant, having already raised doubts with the jury, asked one question too many. The judge erupted, and ordered the defendant locked up. He was dragged out, shouting to the jury for justice. Ninety minutes later, they brought him back for the verdict.
Forman Edward Bushel pronounced “the defendant guilty of speaking in the street.” Inconveniently, that was not a crime. The incredulous judge tried to clarify it into one; didn’t they really mean he was guilty of speaking to an unlawful assembly? The jury said no.
Furious, the judge ordered the jury jailed until they reached a guilty verdict. As they were dragged out, before he could be gagged, the defendant shouted that any new verdict would be perjury and eloquently urged the jury not to give up its rights. After their third day in prison, the jury amended its verdict: The defendant was not guilty of any offense, even speaking in the street. The enraged judge imposed stiff fines on the jurors, and locked them up until they paid. He jailed the defendant on the only charge left, wearing a hat in court. The defendant and jurors went to prison together. The jurors stayed there two months, until another judge released them. Foreman Bushel sued, and an appeals court unanimously upheld his suit for false arrest. Someone – probably his father – anonymously paid the defendants fine, and he went free.
That decision, in Bushel’s appeal, established the supreme power of the jury. Free from punishment or interference. That means that the citizens who report to Room 111 have more power in a criminal trial than any judge or prosecutor, president or king. The case took place in London in 1670. The defendant was William Penn. (Founder of Pennsylvania)
This article written for the Justice Times by David Marston in 1987
Just think folks, if our state controlled education our people would learn all this.
AMENDMENT NINE OF YOUR BILL OF RIGHTS
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
AMENDMENT TEN OF YOUR BILL OF RIGHTS
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The 9th and 10th Amendments clearly explain what is the law and the truth. The federal government has limited powers given to it under the Constitution by the people and States.
All other government powers are to be kept by the State and citizens. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. We should demand Congress to eliminate the Department of Education and tell the NEA to go to hell. Controlling education is a right of a State. It is the law! The above Amendments have never been repealed. Prior to the 17th Amendment (direct vote of Senators by the people) the State Legislatures selected the Senators to go to Washington for the sole purpose of guarding the State’s rights. But the international bankers had an agenda. They were the ones behind the 17th Amendment. They wanted direct voting by the people, which would leave the State’s without representation. Now the Senators represented the people and the hell with State rights. Some examples. Abortion, speed limits, federal intervention of people deciding state issues…the definition of marriage…all these and more are state issues the fed government has usurped. If your Constitution was obeyed this couldn’t happen.
Little did people understand the agenda of the bankers. The expansion of government (socialism) would take off undeterred. The centralization of all our institutions would come under control of the federal government. In essence, the 17th Amendment destroyed the protection of the States. The FDR administration was the biggest culprit in perpetuating the destruction of what was once a Constitutional Republic. But it really started (1913) when the three branches of this criminal government gave away control of money to the bankers. FDR was their water-boy. “They” and not Hoover, were the ones that created the depression and stole our gold and converted our country into a democracy (mob rule) – the worst form of government. Whats that saying – “‘He who has the gold makes the rules.”
We are in economic bondage – forever – unless, of course, a miracle happens and the American people, once again, live up to “the land of the free and home of the brave.”
“I’m sorry I have but one bat to swing for my country.” Wheres yours?
PUBLIC SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS – NO CONCERN FOR TRUTH
Italics are mine – Frank Trejo
Recently, in Warwick, Rhode Island, public school teacher Ricco Diprete conducted a study of a new science textbook, General Science, by Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.
Diprete stated the book was so loaded with errors that he uses the mistakes as a teaching tool. He givers his ninth grade students a test grade of 100 for every mistake they can find in the book. He said he found at least 40 errors in the first 180 pages of the book. Not just grammatical errors, but errors in meaning and definition of important science terms.
For instance, the book states that reptiles are egg-laying animals…egg-laying is also a major characteristic of fish…the definition of mammals includes the fact that they give birth to live young. None of these statements are true. Some snakes, which are reptiles, give birth to live young. Some fish do, too, as children with guppies already know. And, as children who have read about the platypus know, not all mammals give birth to live young.
Furthermore, the paragraph on the classification of mammals fails to mention their most definitive characteristic: that they suckle their young. The book then went on to describe stable gasses inaccurately, gave wrong diagrams of different molecules, and gave a totally erroneous definition of the atom, describing it as a basic particle, which it is not.
Even though the publisher’s senior editor for life science wrote to Diprete promising that the errors would be corrected in the next edition of the book, Diprete is not reassured.
“Teachers are using this book and taking everything literally and the children are being totally warped,” he says, “and the problem is worse for teachers teaching out of their specialty. It is increasingly common for English or social studies teachers to be assigned to handle science classes. The book is their authority. If it’s in the book, it’s right.”
Diprete said the problem is not confined to science textbooks. A study done at the USC cited significant accuracy problems with other textbooks, especially United States and world history textbooks.
In a written response from Dan Franck, Ph. D., Senior Editor of Life Science with Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, he indicated, in a round-about way, that most children today are unable to comprehend or understand the fundamental nature of scientific theory. In commenting on the textbook errors, Dr. Franck rationalized that even though some comments may be wrong, “when you take a closer look, they make a lot of sense,” he wrote.
By the way, upon examining Dr. Franck’s one page response to Diprete’s classroom students concerning the errors in his textbook, we found numerous spelling and punctuation errors in the body of the letter.
These days, it seems that we are conned time after time by political leaders and so-called experts. Where did we lose our sense of reality? What lured us into accepting a life of misinformation and deceit? Are people just naturally ignorant, or have we been trained from childhood to accept, without question, the world according to Big Brother?
If we were to capture a full-grown lion from the African grasslands and attempt to impose our will upon it, we would probably become its next meal. But if a young cub is raised in a controlled setting, it would be easy to condition the cub to rely on its new masters. We can do the same thing with a human child, indoctrinating children to become so reliant on his masters that he sacrifices his inner, natural ability to think independently and correctly, focusing instead on outside reference points as if those reference points represent truth.
Our government-sponsored public education system may be the primary cause of this dumming-down process in American education causing our children to become victims of other peoples’ errors.
After 12 years of being subjected to misinformation, state values, and behavior modification in the public schools, is it any wonder that so many of us will blindly accept whatever verbal voo-doo or psychological sorcery is fed to us by experts? If this is how government manages to con us over and over and over? Have we been conditioned to accept deception, willingly spinning ourselves into webs of fantasy and untruth?
Orwell referred to this web as doublespeak. Perhaps government-sponsored public schools should be divided into four sections: truth, probabilities, possibilities, and lies. Considering the circumstances, a child who never attended a public school might be better informed than one who did. Perhaps it is better to know nothing that to be burdened with falsehoods and errors.
The article submitted to the Justice Times by Frank Turano in 1987
PUBLIC EDUCATION’S ROLE IS TO INDOCTRINATE
Public education is designed not necessarily to educate, but to indoctrinate. This is accomplished by cunningly applying the principles of distraction and repetition. The psychological principles of distraction, subliminal perception and repetition are well-known and successfully used by the mind-conditioners in the media, record industry, education and advertising.
Distraction is a tool used by the hypnotist usually represents a flashing or swinging bright object used in conjunction with a monotonous, rhythmic voice giving repetitious suggestions. In a distracted dream-like state, the subject or victim, receives suggestions or information directly into his subconscious mind, bypassing the conscious mind, where the analysis, acceptance or rejection of information takes place.
Steven Jacobson, in his enlightening book, Mind Control in the United States, does a thought provoking expose on the subject. If you are concerned about the war the mind manipulators are waging against you and your children, we urge you to order a copy of this well-documented book from America’s Promise Newsletter P.O. Box 30000, Phoenix Arizona 85046 (may be defunct) On page 17, quoting John Stuart Mills, we read:
“A general state education is a mere contrivance for molding people to be exactly like one another; and as the mold in which it casts them is that which pleases the predominant power in the government…it establishes a despotism over the mind, leading by natural tendency to one over the body. Education of the young is used to condition them to what comes later, thus eliminating the difference between propaganda and teaching. Propaganda cannot work effectively without education. The mind is conditioned with vast amounts of information posing as ‘facts’ and ‘knowledge’ dispensed for ulterior motives.”
It is for such reasons that increasing numbers of families are switching to home schooling for their children.
The author makes this statement: …”the media has created a state of mind of inner turmoil in citizens through portrayal of violence and chaos and irrational behavior. This inner state is reflected in the chaotic world outside.”
According to the 1982 Nielson Report on television, the typical high school graduate has witnessed about 150,000 violent acts on television, including an estimated 25k deaths. Perhaps we should count the number of hours each week we spend feeding on the swill that pours forth into our living room from the television set. Many have felt the urge to discard their sets, but have lamely rationalized: “I depend on TV for the news.” We will let Thomas Jefferson respond to this:
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
The article was by The America’s Promise Newsletter in 1987.
To remind the reader, the 10th plank of the Communist Manifesto is controlled of the educational system by government. Through Academia and then the main stream media, our people are kept in a state of ignorance. Most believe the lying sob’s in politics.
But the reason we allow it to continue is because we are a socialist/communist country now. The will of the American people has been broken. Socialism is one-step away from communism. As I’ve written before, the rich invented communism to control people and to make lots of money. This is their agenda and it’s getting close to communism.
They are accomplishing this because they own the paper in your pocket called Federal Reserve Notes and administer the monetary system of our country under the 5th and 2nd plank of the 10 planks. They have the gold – they make the rules. All elected officials since 1913 have known this.
WE HAVE A CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT (THREE BRANCHES) ON OUR HANDS, BEHOLDEN TO THE BANKERS, AND NOW THEY ARE ALLOWING WALL STREET TO RAPE THE SHIT OUT OF US.
All these meetings being conducted by Congress addressing the financial disaster is nothing but a show, folks. All three branches are responsible for all our ills because they operate outside the Constitution. It is the U.S. Supreme Court that has done the most damage. Your Constitution mandates that the Court monitor the activities of the other two branches to protect us from congressional crimes and they have failed intentionally to protect the illegal system shoved down our throats. I believe it’s because they don’t think our Constitution counts anymore. I say they can go to hell!
Most all articles I reprint are from the 80’s. But our transformation to this rotten system started back in the early 60s when socialist and communists started taking over our institutions.
And this is one of the reasons we have government controlling our education – to keep us ignorant.
