Township News

By Claire Kelley to the Justice Times – 1987

“Counsel” One of Most Misunderstood Rights

Italics are mine – Frank Trejo – Yesterday’s News Today

The author Claire Kelley was considered one of the best informed in Constitutional Law. Several decades ago when the tax protesting movement was at its height many would follow her writings which in turn was valuable information when battling the IRS in the court room.

“In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right…to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” … - 6^th Amendment, U.S Constitution.

The right to assistance of counsel, is one of the most important – and one of the most misunderstood rights we are guaranteed. It is frequently misunderstood – even by trial courts – evidenced by the many appeals from denial of counsel, due process and abuse of discretion, which are won, in this area of law.

It is clear from the record that convictions will be set aside when criminal defendants have been denied legal counsel – either at trial, or at any of the critical, preliminary stages of prosecution.

When the government exerts undue pressure upon the defendant’s lawyer, it too should be deemed an unconstitutional deprivation of the right to counsel, for the accused. Pelley v. U.S. (1954) CA – Indiana, 214 F2d 597.

If the government audits defense counsel or any member of his staff for taxes, or threatens to deport counsel’s wife, or attempts to disbar counsel from a particular case – these are but a few examples of undue pressure sometimes exerted. Also, for many years there has been a mind set in the lower courts that appointed counsel need not be held to the same standard as retained counsel.

This stupidity was laid to rest in Cuyler v. Sullivan (1980) 446 US 335, in which the court held that the same standard must apply to both counsel, whether retained or appointed. A crucial deprivation of counsel, occurs when the trial court (i.e., judge) refuses to allow sufficient time for defense counsel to prepare for trial. See: U.S. v. Helwig, (1947)

When this is unreasonably done, it is appeal-able pre-trial, as an abuse of discreation (not as deprivation of counsel). They are often reversed by appellate courts because where counsel is denied by such abuse, the conviction is void.

Speaking of a court’s rush to judgment, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that even though trial courts must be allowed wide discretion in the granting of continuances, the right to counsel was a limit on the court’s discretion. It held:

“That discretion only exceeds its constitutional bounds when it is exercised to deny a continuance on the basis of an unreasoning and arbitrary ‘insistence on expeditiousness in the face of a justifiable request for delay.’” Sampley v. Attorney General of North Carolina,. (1986 – CA 4, NC) 786 F2d 610,613; also see: U.S. v Koblitz, (1986 – CA 11, Fla.) 803 F2d 1523. Further, the rejection of defendant’s selected attorney, may also be denial of counsel.

“We would reject reality if we were to suggest that lawyers are a homogeneous group. Attorneys are not fungible, as are eggs, apples and oranges. Attorneys may differ as to their trial strategy, their oratory style, or the importance they give to particular legal issues.

“These differences, all within the range of effective and competent advocacy, may be important in the development of a defense. It is generally the defendant’s right to make a choice from the available counsel in the development of his defense.

“Given this reality, a defendant’s decision to select a particular attorney, becomes critical to the type of defense he will make and thus, falls within the ambit of the Sixth Amendment.” U.S. v. Laura, (1979) CA – 3 Penna., 607 F2d 52,56

Again this denial of selected counsel is appeal-able, pre-trial, as an abuse of discretion. Let us be very clear about this: If it was appealed as a Sixth Amendment deprivation by defendant, it is this writer’s opinion that the appeal would be denied, even though such a deprivation, did indeed, occur. Then the defendant and his friends would all complain about the unfairness of the courts.

But in such an instance, the denial of such an appeal, is strictly according to the law. If you appeal on the wrong grounds, even if you are right, you lose. That’s why it’s so important to know exactly what you’re doing when you select your grounds for appeal.

The Justice Department is becoming bolder about attacking attorneys – particularly when trying to convict criminal defendants. It’s a new addition to their crime-fighting tools. However, they are also tampering with due process here.

“If in any case, civil or criminal, a state or federal court were arbitrarily to refuse to hear a party by counsel, employed by and appearing for him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such a refusal would be a denial of a hearing, and, therefore, of due process in the constitutional sense.” Powell v. Alabama, (1932) 287 US 45,68. It is important for criminal defendants and their lawyers not to be intimidated by the court – or by the prosecution.

While appeal courts do not look favorably upon pre-trial appeals, in most cases they still consider such appeals when they involve serious aspects of the trial such as the counsel, the jury, or the recusal of the judge for good and sufficient reason. Other matters are best appealed post-trial, if conviction occurs.

Again speaking of a person’s right to be heard through counsel of his own choosing, the Chandler court concluded that:

“Regardless of whether petitioner would have been entitled to the appointment of counsel, his right to be heard through his own counsel was unqualified.” Chandler v. Fretag, (1954) 348 US 3, at p. 9; also see, Anonymous Nos. 6&7 v. Baker, (1959) 360 US 287

Lastly, there is one aspect to all this that indigent defendants should understand. When they receive court-appointed counsel, they do not have to take a public defender. If they are firm in their refusal of a career public defender – either because of his poor track record in winning criminal cases, or his lack of background in a particular area of law, such as taxation – the defendant may submit a request to the court for the appointment of a lawyer in private practice, in whom he has confidence. It may well be someone he’d like to hire but can’t afford. This has often happened in federal court in tax cases.

It is good to know that the court cannot force upon a defendant a lawyer in whom he has no confidence. That is because the Sixth Amendment says that he has the right to enjoy the assistance of counsel of choice.

Any defense lawyer who thinks you’re crazy, or who believes you’re guilty, or who is pro-government, or who expresses fear for his job, or if he pursues certain lines of defense, or who insists you plea bargain when you are innocent – may be replaced if the defendant screams loud enough, since the courts have admitted that assistance must be effective. McMann v. Richardson (1970) 397 US 759 at p. 771

There is also another reason for this: all defendants are guaranteed equal protection of the law (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment). A poor man is entitled to every bit as good a defense as a rich man. This also includes investigative help as well, this writer believes.

Courts are beginning to agree. If a poor man does not have the same right to a good defense as does a rich man, then he is denied equal protection of the law because those with first rate lawyers and investigative budgets – would be found guilty.

This is especially important in allegations of white collar crime, which is often used to secure the conviction of political enemies of a particular administration through income tax and similar laws…..end of article

I refrain from my usual comments. There is much I can’t comprehend about this information. But I will say this. If you have relatives or friends that are in the legal profession, this article and many more on this website is perhaps valuable information they never learned in college. As an example. I’ve read numerous times that when law students take their law exam they are not asked questions about the Constitution unless they are specializing in Constitutional law.

Accountants and tax lawyers would benefit if they would read the many articles by Claire in regards to tax laws. She is an expert.

People such as me, through the years have been shut down by the criminals in government. If some of you are steady readers I would suggest you company everything from this website from the beginning and keep it to share with others if it ever happens to me. There is too much of a track record of the IRS destroying who they consider dissidents (4^th plank of communist manifesto)

Oh well! Time for another six-pack of Schlitz.

“I AM SORRY I ONLY HAVE ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

The following was written by Publisher Ajay Lowery. It is a personal opinion that was published in 1987 for his “The Justice Times” newspaper. Most articles I present are some I saved from his newspaper. As old as the articles are their meaning still apply today. Unfortunately, it doesn’t exist any longer. If ever someone out there happens to have been a subscriber then, please contact me. My e-mail address is franktrejo1257@hotmail.com

Italics are mine – Frank Trejo

I have just completed reading a book entitled The Story of the Constitution which was written by Sol Bloom, the director general of the 1937 U.S. Constitution Sesquicentennial Commission.

The book explains how the Constitution came into being, the thoughts of the framers and the circumstances surrounding the debates. It has pictures of most of the framers, a reprint of George Washington’s farewell address, the text of the Constitution and the Proclamation of Independence.

One of the outstanding features of the book is the analogy drawn by Bloom when comparing our system of government with the solar system. Here are some excerpts:

“As the sun is the center of the center of attraction and controlling power that binds and moves the planets in our system, so the people are the center and controlling power that binds and moves their governments in one system.

“The law which the solar system obeys is not written, but its operation is partly disclosed and partly understood. The law which the American political system obeys is partly written for all men to read. It is the Constitution of the United States.

“The limits of the powers of the sun and the people are not known. They never have been tested to the limit. The composition of the sun is hidden in nature. The composition of the people is hidden in human nature. Reason assumes that the sun has powers beyond those known to us. Reason plus knowledge assets that the people have reserved powers which never have been expressed in written law.

“The United States and the states may be compared to planets revolving around their sun – the people.”

Bloom explains the way our system works with a system of checks and balances:

“The legislative, executive and judicial powers are lodged in separate bodies of public servants whose powers and duties compel them to check and balance one another. No uncontrolled power is lodged in any one.”

Bloom says the law which controls the solar system is divine and therefore perfect and though the law which controls the American political system is not perfect, “after 150 years it has been found to approach more nearly the symmetry of the law that rules the universe than any other emanation of the human mind and will.”

In reference to the judiciary he says:

“A court is created with power to hold all authorities within their allotted spheres, and this court itself is bound to remain within its allotted sphere.”

Wouldn’t it be nice if all our federal judges would practice these principles today, instead of overstepping their bounds of authority. This book is 50 years old and should be a part of the curriculum in every high school civics class. In the conclusion of the book Bloom makes these observations:

“If you and I believe that life comes from God and that the Creator endows man with the right of liberty when He breathes life into him, we must agree that the framers of the Constitution were obeying the will of God when they sought a way to perpetuate liberty, life and the right to enjoy liberty that comes from God.”

I maintain that next to the Bible, the book by which men live and die, the most precious expression of the human soul is the Constitution. In the Bible man finds solace and instruction in the most secret and sacred relation of the soul – its relation to God.

In the Constitution we find solace and security in the next most important thing in life – our liberty.

When danger threatens my life or liberty I can take refuge in the Constitution. Into that fortress neither President nor Congress nor armies nor mobs can enter and take away life or liberty.

Blooms comments on the preamble are beautiful:

“Let us consider the preamble to the Constitution. We do not know from whose brain it came, but we know it sounds the heartbeat of its framers. It is the majestic voice of the people, giving expression to their soul’s desire.”

This book is 184 pages long and well worth reading. We may investigate to see if its still available or perhaps can be reprinted. It is our feeling that our Constitution is the true heartbeat of America, and we are delighted to discover that there were those who felt the same way fifty years ago….end of article.

For those that went to public schools, like many elected officials that didn’t learn too much about our sacred documents, here is the preamble to the Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

In this website if you scroll to the beginning of all the articles posted you’ll find one entitled “Who Killed The Constitution.”

Many people in our society are not aware of how much damage our Constitution has experienced. Most of our rights under the “Bill of Rights” have almost been eradicated. I find it sad that many in politics, in all levels, are ignorant of our Constitution. Quite often politicians in Washington, in referring to the Constitution, will misquote it. There are some in State governments that are offended by some of my material (written by others) Perhaps it is my personal commentary that they find offensive. Because I call Democrats and Republicans in Congress criminals? Because I call President Obama a radical? You politicians that are offended GO TO HELL! If I were in your district I would do my best to kick you out of office. Send you back in the workforce and start earning your pay instead of being supported by my tax dollars.

That type of politician that complains about citizens expressing their 1^st Amendment right doesn’t belong in politics. Right now there are several in Congress who are threatening to shut down conservative talk radio – you know why? Because it is through talk radio that we learn of crimes being committed in Congress. The media intentionally omits much because there are many in the media that are on the left side – socialist and communist if I may.

“El derecho de nacer libre. El derecho de vivir libre. El derecho de morir libre.” Viva la Constitucion! (Put that in your pipe you bi-lingual communists)

“I AM SORRY I ONLY HAVE ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

By Jack Rifen to The Justice Times – 1983

Italics are mine – Frank Trejo

It has been stated that there is a conspiracy to overthrow the Constitution of the United States and place the American people into a slave society. (It’s already happened. We are economic slaves to the owners of the Federal Reserve) The above is very true but it is not a conspiracy. In order to call some act a conspiracy, the act must be done secretly.

There is no secret about the tyrannical acts placed upon the people by government servants who make up Congress. (Quite often, I remind people that just because ANYONE in government passes Acts or Statutes that become law are not necessarily constitutional. It is a legal fact that any act has to be in harmony with what your constitution reads. As an example, the civil rights act was legal because States’ were denying citizens constitutional rights. Whereas, the Federal Reserve Act (1913) is not in harmony with what your Constitution reads – “only Congress can coin money and regulate the value thereof…” This law is still in your Constitution – it has never been repealed. The criminals in Congress have been corrupted ever since.)

The people must unite once again and establish the Committee of the States as provided for in Article Five of the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union of 1788, ratified by the States of the Union on March 1, 1791, which calls for a committee of delegates from each state to watch this federal government and its policy making. This committee has the power and authority which is derived from each state constitution to remove all officers, employees, and elected officials who subvert the supreme law of the land and may remove subverters with force if necessary. (A reminder. Because 90 percent of our people have never read the Constitution many have been made to believe that the U.S. Supreme Court is the law. That is a lie! YOUR CONSTITUTION IS THE LAW!)

Some of you readers are possibly wondering just how “we the people” will be placed into a slave society? Just how can a FREE country be changed into a SLAVE state? The following clearly shows how this will take place. (Too many for me to list. This includes several executive orders in place that will allow the government to take over many institutions if and when a crisis exists. There are many articles in this website that explains this. In 1979 President – I’m not a crook Nixon – put most of these executive orders under one – Executive Order 11490. Go to the Internet and type in executive orders and you’ll see many.)

Should this ever come to be Chapters 8 and 11 of International Law, established in the United Nations, will nullify the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. (I’m not sure about this. There is an article in the web that explains this.)

How do “we the people” stop this tyranny? Simply establish Article Five of the Articles of Confederation and the delegates which make up the Committee of States.

ARTICLE V OF THE ARTCLES OF CONFEDERATION

(America’s First Constitution)

(First paragraph) For the most convenient management of the general interests of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed in such manner as the legislatures of each State shall direct, to meet in Congress on the first Monday in November, in every year, with a power reserved to each State to recall its delegates, or any of them, at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead for the remainder of the year.

ARTICLE 11 SECTION 4 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

The President, Vice President and ALL CIVIL OFFICERS of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Forming a Committee of States will not happen, although it’s a sound idea. If we had decent and honest people in Congress they would execute the above Article 11. But because they are criminals they protect themselves. Nixon and Clinton should have been thrown out. Nixon shouldn’t have been pardon and Bill should have been removed. We should repeal the Presidential pardon – it has been corrupted.

All the crime being committed in Congress in the present goes unabated. Congress is responsible for the present economic crisis. They had been warned as far back as 2004 of the pending crisis but did nothing. Why? Because those in committee positions of power were on the take from Freddie Mac – Fannie Mae and Wall Street. The hypocrite Senator Dodd had received over $100, 000 from AIG. So, how come he isn’t before a committee? They protect themselves. Weren’t our founding fathers great to have had the “Committee of States” in the original Constitution.”

Here we have a grass root movement (Tea Party) to send a message to Washington D.C. complaining of unfair practices but you mark my words nothing will change – the government is too corrupted. But I do admire those that are involved with the Tea Party thing.

What I recommend is for those hundreds of thousands, if not over a million, by April 15, is to direct that commitment and patriotic passion and join the lesser of two evils (GOP) and change it from the ground up. Imagine what you people could do by controlling one of the two parties that have everything locked up. Third Parties, have, are, and will always be shut out. Drop everything Third Parties and citizens, for once give your vote to those in the GOP for the purpose of stopping the wannabe Dictator. We must win at least one of the two houses to stop the further destruction of our country by the present day criminals that don’t give a shit about you and the Constitution.

“I AM SORRY I HAVE ONLY ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

“WHEN ALL GOVERNMENT, DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN, IN LITTLE AS IN GREAT THINGS, SHALL BE DRAWN TO WASHINGTON AS THE CENTER OF ALL POWER, IT WILL RENDER POWERLESS THE CHECKS PROVIDED OF ONE GOVERNMENT ON ANOTHER, AND WILL BECOME AS VENAL AND OPPRESSIVE AS THE GOVERNMENT FROM WHICH WE SEPARATED.” (Thomas Jefferson – Aug. 18 1821)

The following article comes from David J. Smith

Editor of the NEWSWATCH NEWSLETTER of which

I subscribe to.

The Italics are mine – Frank Trejo

State’s Rights – The Tenth Amendment

Three State of Texas Congressmen introduced on Feb. 17, 2009 a Concurrent Resolution that Texas was putting the Federal Government in Washington, D.C., on notice that Texas was reclaiming its Tenth Amendment Rights as laid out in the Constitution of the United States.

Bill: H.C.R. 50…Legislative Session: 81(R) Council Document: 81R 5789 MMS-F

Author: Creighton / Hughes / Berman – Filed 02/17/2009

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;” and

WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, Today, 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

WHEREAS, Many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and EACH SOVEREIGN STATE in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may NOT USURP; and

WHEREAS, Section 4, Article 1V, of the Constitution says, “ The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,” and the Ninth Amendment states that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;” and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the 81^st Legislature of the State of Texas hereby claim sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That this serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That the Texas secretary of state forward official copies of this resolution to the president of the United States, to the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate of the United States Congress, and to all the members of the Texas delegation to the congress with the request that this resolution be officially entered in the Congressional Record as a memorial to the Congress of the United States of America.

Approximately 25 States are now reclaiming State’s Rights under the Tenth Amendment because of the threat of a Socialist State being created of finalized under Obama. Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy stated after the War Between the States ended in 1865, that the issue of States’ Rights had not been settled by force of war. It would rise again in another time. IS IT NOW RISING? Have the American people finally realized that Socialism is being installed?

Something very strange has been happening as of late – state legislatures have quietly begun a rebellion against the Federal Government in Washington, D.C. After many decades of an uninterrupted drift – or push by Ted Kennedy and many others – toward a Socialist state, State legislatures are reclaiming their Tenth Amendment rights as laid down in the Constitution.

Tenth Amendment : “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Acorrdingly, many states, including Texas, Arizona, Hawaii, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, and Washington, are now considering either legislation or resolutions designed to reassert powers usurped by a Socialist infiltrated federal establishment.

The Oklahoma House Resolution 1003 is similar to the Texas H.C.R. 50 quoted above. The Tenth Amendment is its basis. The Resolution concluded:

“NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE OF THE 1ST SESSION OF THE 52^ND OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:

“THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.”

The resolution serves notice on the federal government that it is to “cease and desist” in the process of issuing mandates to the State of Oklahoma that exceed the powers granted to it by the U.S. Constitution , and it resolves that all compulsory federal legislation which directs the state to comply under threat of civil or criminal sanctions, or which require the state to take certain actions or lose federal funding, shall be prohibited or repealed.

In New Hampshire, a resolution reasserting State’s rights reads, in part, as follows:

“Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a FREE, SOVEREIGN , and INDEPENDENT State: and do, and FOREVER hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America…”

This proves once again that the people of New Hampshire take seriously their state motto. Live Free or Die! The Resolution concludes with a powerful declaration, saying that any act of Congress, any executive order of the President of the United States, or any directive of the Federal Courts “which assumes a power not delegated to the government of the United States of America by the Constitution…and which serves to diminish the liberty of the several States or their citizens, shall constitute a NULLIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION of the United States of America…”

The Tenth Amendment controversy has RISEN again, just as Jefferson Davis said it would…end of article.

Well, I had run into resolutions like this before, except Texas‘.Who knows, maybe this time it’ll light the spark that we need to wake up many to the dangers facing our freedom and liberties. We have been socialized for may years. You’d think that anytime a state passes a resolution like the above the press would be all over it. An example of a controlled press.

I’m from the school that says its gone beyond socialism. All one has to learn is that our monetary system is administered under the 2^nd and 5^th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The 4^th plank calls for the arrests of dissidents and rebels (tax protesters) We’ve had an illegal government system for many years. The three branches of our beloved Constitution had been subverted a long time ago.

I will do my part and send a copy of this to all in the Arizona Legislature. Please do the same. IF something good begins to happen I think the powers that control, what used to be our government, will ORDER the traitors in Congress and the White House to prevent it. We’ve got to at least get control of one of the Houses next year to stop the further communizing of our country. Paranoia? Hardly, just type in the words Communist Manifesto in the Internet and you’ll see for your selves. Incidentally, the 10^th plank is control of education by government. 90 percent of our people have never read the Constitution – hence, a country full of people that don’t understand. This is why politicians do as they please knowing the dummies will never know. How sad.

“El derecho de nacer libre. El derecho de vivir libre y el derech de morir libre.” Translation for you soon to be minorities – “The right to be born free. The right to live free, and the right to die free.”

“I AM SORRY I ONLY HAVE ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

(A threat to heritage)

Italics are mine – Frank Trejo…Yesterday’s News Today

This article by Dr. Samuel Francis to the Justice Times – 1990

Dr. Francis is the recipient of the Distinguished Writing Award

of the American Society for Editorial Writing.

Like Satan in Dante’s Inferno, the forces threatening the integrity of the American nation and its culture have three faces. The “global economy” and political one-world-ism jeopardize the historic character, independence, and the very sovereignty of the United States.

The third threat, the mass immigration that this country has endured for the last 15 years or more, is no less a danger to the cultural norms by which American civilization has identified itself throughout most of its history. Nevertheless, like the internationalization of our economy (the criminals in Congress are bailing out foreign banks) and government, the internationalization of our population is consistent with the interests of the elites that welcome and encourage it.

Some 600,000 legal immigrants and refugees and as many as one to two million illegal aliens enter this country every year, most of them from Third World countries as different from the United States as the tattoos of the Jivaro Indians are from paintings of Rembrandt. Actually, no one knows how many illegal aliens are here, but most authorities now acknowledge that the immigration to this country in the last decade rivals the size of the last inundation of the late 19^th and early 20^th centuries. (If people in our country allow Democrats, with help of hypocrite Republicans like Senator McCain to pass amnesty legislation, millions upon millions of people will eventually be added to the Democratic Party rolls)

Americans who live on the periphery of the United States in the east, south or west are familiar with the common place results of the invasion: clerks, waiters and cab drivers who can’t speak English and can’t make change in dollars and cents; stores, churches and whole shopping districts where the signs are in languages or scripts that most of us can’t even identify, let alone read.

But these are mainly just irritants. Eventually, they will be resolved, as the newcomers and their children are – “assimilated” – i.e., pick up televisionese and adopt the sartorial splendors of K-Mart in place of their customary beach towels and pajamas. When defenders of mass immigration talk about “assimilation,” that’s the kind they usually mean. Unfortunately, it doesn’t help, unless you believe (as many defenders of mass integration do believe) that American culture consists merely in what can be purchased at the nearest shopping mall.

Those who believe a deeper American culture still exists and ought to be conserved (they used to be called “conservatives”) …(until the communists in our country made conservatism a dirty word) have good reason to worry that the new throngs of foreigners among us will not assimilate to it in any enduring way. Not simply language and clothing, but also less tangible qualities, such as the unspoken assumptions of political culture, art and literature, entertainment and religion, education, morals, the family, and concepts of work and property together create the set of common norms by which Americans know themselves to be different from Canadians, Mexicans, Europeans, and other cultures.

But the process of becoming a real member of a living society is somewhat more complicated than translating advertising slogans into Japanese or Swahili.

It is especially complicated when, as today, there are major obstacles to assimilation. Sociologist Nathan Glazer, a supporter of immigration, points out that the social pressure that in earlier eras helped accelerate the acculturation of new immigrants is today largely absent. Today’s “cultural authorities” (communists) legitimize and instigate “alternate life styles,” eschew stereotypes, scorn WASP ethnocentrism, and indulge every known form of deviation and idiosyncrasy from the religious exotica of Santeria (a religion merging the worship of Yoruba deities with veneration of Roman Catholic saints: practiced in Cuba and spread to other parts of the Caribbean and to the U.S. by Cuban émigrés) to the perversions of the National Man-Boy Love Association. “Popular opinion” writes Mr. Glazer, “now questions the legitimacy and desirability of forcefully imposing a common identity on immigrants and members of minority groups.”

But it’s less “popular opinion” perhaps than the interests of the elites that run the country and refuse to take the minimal steps to restrict immigration, which actually serves to enhance their power even as it promotes the decomposition of a common culture. The uses to which the millions of new immigrants may be put go well beyond the cheap labor they provide to Western agribusiness and Southern construction firms.

The elites that prevail in the United States today are bureaucratic and technocratic, gaining power by their ability to manage and manipulate social change through the fused apparatus of the state, the economy, and cultural organizations in the form of mass media (communists) foundations, schools, and churches. (The church should stay out of the immigration issue and pay more attention to their clergy by weeding out the pedophiles that are scarring our young emotionally)

In the past, these elites have been able to ally with the American underclass – first, with the industrial working class in the early 20^th century; more recently with the urban black lumpenproletariat (unskilled workers, vagrants, and criminals) – to dislodge rival elites in private, social, and local institutions and jurisdictions and to exploit the middle class.

But as the under classes of the past graduate to middle income status, the elite need new proletarians as allies to help sustain their dominance.

Third World immigration allows for the importation of a new underclass and provides un-glimpsed visas of social manipulation in the form of new opportunities for managing civil rights, ethnic conflicts, education, health, housing, welfare, social therapy, and assimilation itself. In 1988, state officials in California were bickering over who would control their state’s 55 percent of the $3.4 billion in federal aid intended as welfare, education and health care aid for immigrants; and other states also were contending for their fair share of the booty.

Another outcome, also useful to American elites, is the political exploitation of the immigrants, legal or not, who constitute a new electorate as well as a new underclass. Liberal Democrats (communists) are demanding “instant voter registration” laws, to be enforced and supervised by federal officials against local and state jurisdictions that are thinly disguised mechanisms for allowing aliens to cast ballots.

President Obama had ties with ACORN back in his Chicago days as an organizer. ACORN is a radical organization that is being investigated by a dozen states for conducting criminal activities, mostly having to do with voter fraud. Yet, Obama saw to it that ACORN receives either 3 or 4.6 billion dollars of our money to keep their destructives ways going. Imagine, the President of the United States in collusion with radical organizations. If you people have ACORN in your cities get on the phone and demand that elected officials monitor these bastards to find out what crimes they are committing. Stand-up god-dam-it! It’s our government and country. We have to stop what appears to be a dictatorship in the making. Next year will be our only chance left. Get started. Tell your friends in third parties to support GOP candidates just once in 2010. We’ve got to control at least one of the two houses in Congress. Otherwise communism keeps getting stronger.

But Republicans (lesser of two evils) are not far behind, and in 1988, neo-conservative idol Jack Kemp gaily predicted that the GOP would have to appeal to the newcomers. Which party will take care of traditional Americans no one seems to know, or care.

Mass immigration is also perhaps the most useful instrument by which the very idea of nationality can be liquidated, and it thus fits well with the forces of economic and political globalism and with the interests of the emerging transnational elite, into which our own technocrats are fusing. As national populations and the cultures they carry become interchangeable through migration, the concrete meaning of citizenship, political loyalty, sovereignty, and other elements of nationality will yield to a new supranational regime over which the emergent elite presides.

Caught between the new underclass and the new elite, plain old Americans can look forward to subsidizing through their taxes not only their own cultural dispossession, but also the eventual disappearance of their nation itself, to the advantage of an elite that has disengaged itself from the body of the society it manages.

If the Americans at the heart of that body are serious about preserving their nation and their culture, they will have to escape from the vise the new elite and the new proletariat have constructed by freezing themselves from the newcomers above and below them.

End of article

I’ve said it before and it’s worth repeating – the game plan of the “elite” whom I say are the owners of the Federal Reserve – is to put all of the countries in North America under one economic system. Just as they’ve done in Europe – under the Euro-dollar. This is why politicians in government have been so lax in enforcing immigration law. They want Americans to get used to all this “assimilation” before they lower the boom.

“I AM SORRY I ONLY HAVE ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

(This article reprinted with permission from Newswatch Magazine March 2009)

Some comments by me are in italics – Frank Trejo

NESARA’S reformations are the main tools for implementing U.S. Supreme Court rulings made in January of 1993 relating to several cases filed by farmers living in the U.S. Midwest and Mountain states areas against banks, specific government officials, certain judges, and others. Certain U.S. Generals and Admirals were supportive of, and one General was co-plaintiff in the Farmer’s Cases, that went to the U.S. Supreme Court. You may recall that in the 1970s and 1980s there were news reports and documentaries about thousands of family farmers losing their farms to foreclosure. Willie Nelson has been doing Farm Aid concerts for years to help these farmers.

In the 1980s, some of the farmers investigated why there were so many bank foreclosures on their farms. They discovered certain banks were fraudulently foreclosing on their farms. When these farmers turned to government officials for assistance and filed lawsuits against these banks, they learned certain government officials and judges were working in collusion with the banks. The farmers also learned that certain aspects of the current Federal Reserve banking system were UNCONSTITUTIONAL and pursued their lawsuits through the Federal District Court in Denver and other locations. Some of the farmers involved in the lawsuit were harassed by the IRS, and in turn, investigated the IRS involvement with the bankers. After years of lawsuits, several of the farmers’ lawsuits reached the U.S. Supreme Court, including Baskerville and Foster v. Credit Bank of Wichita, Federal Land Bank, and First Interstate Bank of Fort Collins. (Type in this case to confirm authenticity – Frank) This case was heard in the Denver Federal District Court. For simplicity, we will call these cases the “Farmers’ Cases.” We will see soon why these cases are so important.

In early 1993, the nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruled seven to two in favor of these farmers on ALL major issues, including that the Federal Reserve Banking system was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, that the U.S. has been OPERATING OUTSIDE THE CONSTITUTION SINCE 1933, that major REFORMATIONS of government and our banking system are REQUIRED and that financial redress and remedies MUST be provided for financial losses due to bank FRAUD suffered by generations of Americans. The farmers involved certain very powerful U.S. military Generals and Admirals in their cases. These Generals and Admirals made it clear to the U.S. Supreme Court Judges that they knew the farmers’ cases were righteous and watched in the courtroom as the U.S. Supreme Court Judges heard the cases. The presence of the Generals and Admirals is why the majority of the judges felt they had to rule properly and in favor of the farmers.

Because of the extraordinary nature of the necessary reformation, the Court SEALED all court records and put all people directly involved under Non Disclosure agreement (gag orders) until the reformation (reforms) are publicly and officially announced.

The Court had a duty to design and implement reformations (reforms) to correct the injustices; therefore, the Court recruited experts in Constitutional Law, banking, economics, and monetary systems to work in task force groups to develop the needed reformations (reforms). During the two years these expert groups developed the reformations, irrefutable proof was provided to the U.S. Supreme Court Judges that the 16^th Amendment to the Constitution, the income tax amendment, had not been properly ratified. The Judges had no choice but to include abolishing income taxes in the reformations development process. It was also found that there had been a definite pattern of the federal administrations and Congress ignoring the Constitution in laws passes since 1933. Franklin Delano Roosevelt took the U.S. out of the Constitutional Law when he declared a national banking emergency and amended the Trading With the Enemy Act in March of 1933. (It is a legal fact that no one, not even Presidents’, may change or alter anything in our Constitution without the permission of the people via Article 5 of OUR CONSTITUTION – not even Martial Law – as long as the courts remain open. Put that in your pipe and smoke it lawyers and Presidents’ – My comment)

Constitutional Law experts working on government reformations determined that to end the pattern of blatant disregard for the Constitution, it would be necessary to require the sitting U.S. administration and U.S. Congress to resign when Constitutional Law is restored. Following completion of the development of the reformations, the Court appointed certain experts and others to a “committee” which has authority to manage the process of announcing and implementing the reformations.

Once the reformations were developed, the Court made only half-hearted efforts (could have been predicted) to implement the reformations through an “Accords” agreement process with the Clinton administration. During that time, very little progress has been made to implement the reformations. However, quantities of the new U.S. Treasury currency, backed by gold, were printed and shipped to certain banks in the U.S. where the currency has sat in vaults for years awaiting the announcement of the reformations. When and IF NESARA is announced, many more shipments of the new Treasury currency will be made to all banks in the U.S. under guard by U.S. military units.

During the years of the Accords process, the Court approved a “claims against the government process” – also known as Farm Claims or Bank Claims – which was meant to provide specific financial redress to Americans. However, various groups and individuals have interfered with the claims process.

Finally, in 1998, the powerful U.S. military Generals and Admirals consulted with Constitutional Law experts regarding the lack of progress in getting the much-needed reformations implemented. The Generals, Admirals, and Constitutional Law experts all knew that the U.S. Supreme Court Judges were purposely stalling the reformations process. It was decided that the only other way to accomplish the crucial reformations was to compile all the needed reformations into law and have the law passed by Congress. The National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA) containing required reformations was submitted to Congress in 1999, where it sat with little action for almost a year.

Late one evening in March of 2000, a written quorum call was hand-delivered by Delta Force and Navy Seals to only members of the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives who were sponsors and co-sponsors of NESARA. The members were immediately accompanied by the Delta Force and Navy Seals to their respective voting chambers, where they passed the National economic Security and Reformation Act. The Act provides the following, which is to take place immediately after the official announcement of NESARA, that is to be televised live from Washington D.C.

NESARA

NATIONAL ECONOMIC SECURITY AND REFORMATION ACT

THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC SECURITY AND REFORMATION ACT WAS PASSED BY THE U.S. CONGRESS IN YEAR 2000 TO IMPLEMENT NECESSARY REFORMS. NESARA PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING:

Restores Constitutional Law in America as of NESARA’S public announcement.

Removes US administration officials and all members of the US Congress from their positions due to their continuous unconstitutional actions. Bush, Cheney, Cabinet members, and all members of Congress are immediately removed from office by NESARA’S public announcement. These removals allow a fresh start at the national level. Using the Constitutional Line of Succession, NESARA installs Constitutionally acceptable NESARA President and Vice President Designates until new federal elections can take place within six months after NESARA’S announcement.

Because NESARA abolishes unconstitutional states of emergency, NESARA’S public announcement declares “peace”. US military in Iraq and Afghanistan are immediately recalled to the USA.

As partial remedy for 90 years of government and banking fraud (criminality), NESARA requires zeroing out of credit card balances and bank debt relief be given Americans.

Initiates the US Treasury Bank System with new U.S. Treasury currency backed by gold. The Federal Reserve is abolished; Federal Reserve facilities and most personnel are absorbed into the US Treasury Bank System.

Abolishes Income Taxes in US and creates a national sales tax on new, non-essential items as revenue for government. Essential items such as food and medicine, and used items, are exempt from the sales tax.

Will any President or the powers that are entrenched in Washington, D.C. ever let this information out in the light of day for Americans to understand? Not a chance!!! In many ways, our beloved United States is facing the worst crisis of its history.

* More Americans are unemployed, drowning in debt, and living in poverty than at anytime since World War 11

* Our government irresponsibly races into more debt than at any time in our nation’s history.

* Our military lose their lives in battles for greedy corporations’ gain- not to protect and secure our borders!

*Our elections revolve around lies, bribery, and betrayals.

We do not hear “truth” in our media. The media is controlled by opponents of Americans and America’s Constitutional Law. That is why most Americans have never heard of the information in the pages of Newswatch Magazine.

Some of America’s greatest patriots have spoken the truth concerning what is happening in America today:

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.” Thomas Paine, December 1776.

“We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.”

Abraham Lincoln

“The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind…We have in our power to begin the world over again.” Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776…end of article.

How sad it is that many organization such as this one, try like hell to effect change only to be disappointed by the criminals in government. Just about everything has been tried to no avail. That’s why I’m always repeating – the only way is to join the GOP, change it from the ground up and clean house of criminals in OUR GOVERNMENT!

This article was reprinted from permission of Newswatch Magazine. I am a subscriber and have never been disappointed. It delivers an issue every month of the year with eye-opening information like this one. Please consider subscribing. The fee is $24. The address is:

Newswatch Magazine . P. O. Box 36

Waxahachie, Texas 75168

Phone: (972) 937-2227

I AM SORRY I HAVE ONLY ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

By NEWSWATCH MAGAZINE

It should be noted that for more than two hundred years these International Banking families had dominated the European scene after they had succeeded in establishing the “Bank of England” and other central banks in Germany, France, Italy and Switzerland. Since that “coup of coups” in 1815 when they literally bought control of England for a couple of cents on the dollar, the House of Rothschild has dominated the banking scene (Rothschild, A Family Portrait, by Frederic Morton) All their efforts to foist a permanent central bank on the United States had met with failure. Our Constitution gave the Congress Alone the authority “to coin money, (and) regulate the value thereof.”

Using the created “panic of 1907” as an “example” of America’s great need for a centralized banking authority, a vast propaganda campaign was launched to “sell” the idea to the American public.

The Federal Reserve System (a Central Bank) came into being when the Federal Reserve Act passed the House of Representatives and the Senate late in December, 1913. Under the Act, the bankers were granted the privilege of CREATING money out of nothing and lending to the U.S. Government at interest. The way had now been prepared for the LOOTING of the American nation by the International vultures.

Results of the Violation of the Constitution Concerning Money

By Congressman James Beck – 1933

Congressman James Beck had this to say about the War Powers Act that was issued during World War 1:

“I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the DOCTRINE OF EMERGENCY is the worst. It means that when Congress declares an emergency there IS NO Constitution. This means its Death…But the Constitution of the United States, as a restraining influence in keeping the federal government WITHIN the carefully prescribed channels of power, is moribund [dying], if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes law, there is NO LONGER ANY WORKABLE CONSTITUTION TO KEEP THE CONGRESS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS.”

(Congressman James Beck in the Congressional Record 1933)

Can we believe that the War Powers Act was used as a cover to pass bankruptcy legislation of March 9, 1933? And what are the results? Was Beck right? That Congress is no longer restrained BY the Constitution? Is this WHY the federal government has by-passed local and state powers reserved for them and usurped those powers unto themselves to create a dictatorship? ……………………………………………….

Representative James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33, page H-1303:

Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government HAS BEEN DISSOLVED BY THE EMERGENCY BANKING ACT, MARCH 9, 1933, 48 STAT. 1, PUBLIC LAW 89-719, declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73^rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all the United States Government Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government EXISTS TODAY IN NAME ONLY.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. ALL United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto [illegal] status in NAME ONLY under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government NOW DISSOLVED, the receivers of the bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is now as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor of America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. reads in part: “The U. S .Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States.”

Where is America Headed?

As a result of most of the men and women who were elected to Congress and took an oath or affirmation to uphold the constitution not doing so, our nation has come under the curse of usury. Our nation has been foreclosed on by the International Bankers who hate Christianity.

Notice what a minister, Henry Smith, (1550-1591) once said concerning usury:

“The usurer [loan shark] loveth the borrower, as the ivy loveth the oak. The ivy loveth the oak to grow up by it, so the usurer loveth the borrower to grow rich by him. The ivy claspeth the oak like a lover, but it claspeth out all the juice and sap, that the oak cannot thrive after: So the usurer lendeth like a friend, but he covenanteth like an enemy, for he claspeth the borrower with such hands, that ever after he diminisheth as fast as the usurer increaseth.”

America was the richest nation in the world until the International Bankers got their Federal Reserve Act passed in 1913. Within twenty years, the United States was technically bankrupt. America went from the richest nation to the greatest debtor nation in history. Our constitution was usurped, and our money and credit system was destroyed. Everything the Illuminati (look it up in the internet) wanted to achieve in America has nearly been accomplished. We now only await their dictatorship…end of article

Newswatch Magazine, P.O. Box 36, Waxahachie,Texas 75168

————–

Remember what I have said so many times in the past: GOVERNMENT CANNOT CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION IN ANYWAY SHAPE OR FORM UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE PEOPLE VIA ATICLE 5 OF YOUR CONSTITUTION.

If ever we were to return government to its rightful owners (us) I would strip all names of any politician that had anything to do with that crime. I would start with that scum bag FDR.

I AM SORRY I ONLY HAVE ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

By Phyllis Schlafly – to the Justice Times – 1989

The italics are mine – Frank Trejo – Yesterday’s News Today

The annual resolutions passed by the National Education Association (socialist organization) has just been published, and they are very revealing. They were approved in July in Washington D.C., by the nearly 9,000 delegates who attended the annual convention of this largest and most powerful teachers union.

The NEA is adamantly opposed to the concept that parents should have the right to choose the public school to which they send their children. The NEA calls such choice options “deleterious” (it means harmful – for those of us that went to public schools) and even wants federal legislation to prohibit such plans. The NEA is so vindictive about private schools that it even opposes the renting or selling of closed public school buildings to any private schools. (And it’s not even their property)

The NEA is frank about its reason: It wants to keep out of the community any institution “in direct competition with public schools.” The NEA obviously hates and feels threatened by home-schoolers, stating in a resolution that “home-schooling programs cannot provide the student with a comprehensive education experience.”

The NEA want home-schooling to be permitted only by “persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency” and who use “ a curriculum approved by the state department of education.” (No, the NEA doesn’t want kids learning the truth about what made this country great and by whom)

The NEA wants to get children into the public schools at an earlier and earlier age. The NEA Wants the federal (criminal) government to fund (our money) and mandate early childhood programs in the public schools (that means 3 and 4 year-olds), which would “culminate in mandatory kindergarten with compulsory attendance.”

The NEA wants the public schools to provide every pupil with health, social and psychological services on a “direct and confidential” basis (which means without parental consent).

This should include, according to the NEA resolutions, “comprehensive, school-based, community-funded student health-care clinics” that provide diagnosis, treatment, birth-control methods and instructions in their use. The NEA wants the schools to “assume an advocacy role” for students in working for these objectives. The NEA wants before and after-school programs in order to keep the children in school for a very long day.

The NEA says that guidance and counseling services should be “integrated into the entire education system, starting at the kindergarten level.” This counseling, according to the NEA resolutions, specifically should include homosexual counseling.

The NEA wants the public schools to teach sex courses to every child (how to use condoms using a banana to demonstrate), including birth control, “diversity of sexual orientation” and incest. Emphasizing that this should be done with or without parental consent at every age, the NEA asserts that “it is the right of every individual to live in an environment of freely available information, knowledge and wisdom about sexuality.” (At that young of an age? The question I’ve raised many times before is: Whose kids are these anyway? And the answer is they belong to the government. Numerous times parents attend school meetings to complain as to what is being taught and are told to shut-up and go home. Recently a judge ordered a household to stop home-schooling and to send the children to a public school. That SOB should be thrown out of office. It won’t happen. The will of the American people has been broken.)

The NEA resolutions favor loading up the public school curriculum with all sorts of psychological courses to replace academic ones. Specifically, the NEA wants public school students to be given courses on stress, suicide, conflict, environmental issues and nuclear war.

The NEA is a big supporter of loading up the academic curriculum with global education, now called “multicultural-global education.” The NEA is candid in explaining that the purpose of this global education is to impose on students the particular ideology of America’s “interdependency” with other nations (One world government) and the scarcity of the world’s natural resources. (More lies. There is plenty of oil, they just won’t let us drill. Thanks to the Democrats in Congress)

The NEA resolutions demand that school personnel never be dismissed, suspended, demoted, transferred or retired because of “sex or sexual orientation.”

Parents teach morals at home by their god-given right and teachers in school teach that homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle regardless of what is taught at home. Why should religion not be allowed in schools in any form but it’s alright to teach different lifestyles detrimental to the teachings of home? I want to emphasize that homosexuality to me is not a problem but when the system shoves it down our throats – that is a declaration of war. DID YOU HEAR THAT? Quit pussy-footing around citizens! We are in a cultural war and you don’t want to admit it. Why? Because of political correctness that is a communistic tactic imposed on the American people to shut you up. It is THOUGHT CONTROL! REPUGNANT TO YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT! Go to hell academia, mainstream media, networks, and Hollywood.

The NEA also urges “affirmative action plans and procedures that will encourage active recruitment and employment of women, minorities and men in under-represented education categories.” The NEA vigorously opposes the testing of school personnel for drugs, alcohol or AIDS. The NEA demands that school personnel with AIDS “shall not be fired, non-renewed, suspended, transferred or subjected to any other adverse employment action.” (Just the clergy)

The NEA wants socialized medicine and calls for “a national health-care insurance plan supported by the Congress. (With Democrats now in control of the White House, the House and Senate, they will shove more socialized medicine down our throats and the legislation will be named after the non-swimmer Kennedy.)

The NEA endorses the “use of non-sexist language by all schools.” That means teachers and students must use such clumsy perversions of the English language as “he/she” and “chairperson.” (Political correctness)

If you do not share these NEA views, then you had better look into what is being taught in your local school, because the union that runs the public schools is teaching its values to your children…end of article.

This is why people you elect for the school board are of great importance. Band together in your school district and throw out the ones who perpetuate teachings which are detrimental to your teachings at home.

The communist/socialists have been at it a very long time. The Eagle Forum, of which Phyllis the writer of this article, has been at just as long, but this is where the institutions have failed the American people. Organizations like the Eagle Forum get shut out by the radical organizations.

I keep repeating the following. The only solution to get back our Constitutional system is to do it the right way. That is to join the lesser of two evils- the GOP- the Democrats are too far gone – and change the GOP from the ground up. That means throwing out of the party those Republicans who abandon conservative principles. I say again. Bush was not a conservative; he is a one-world-government just like his dad.

Third parties have no chance at all. The two-party system has it all locked up. Should ever a third-party candidate win the White House he’d still have to contend with the Demos and Republicans. He would be a lame-duck the day he was sworn in.

Understand that we don’t have a constitutional government anymore. We have criminals that occupy elected offices. Why else would our young be sent all over the world to protect the interest of world corporations owned by the powers at be? Why else is the Supreme Court allowed to make laws? Why else is the IRS allowed to trample your Bill of Rights? Why else is the NEA allowed to indoctrinate our youth in socialism? Why else does Congress and the White House spend trillions they don’t have to bailout the banks? Why else does the Congress not enforce tax laws within their own? Why doesn’t Congress indict those responsible for the financial disaster brought on by corrupted Democrats who forced banks to loan money to people who couldn’t afford it? Those Democrats were warned by the White House as far back as 2004. Why else do we have open borders and yet we have around 500,000 of our young in uniform protecting the interest of others?

Folks, all this is allowed to happen, because, quite frankly, the American people have given up and the criminals in Congress know it. They don’t represent the people any longer. They couldn’t careless what you think. THEY REPRESENT THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS!

The agenda has always been to transform our country to third-world status. What I don’t understand is why we are constantly being reminded (propaganda) that all will be well.A. That we will soon recover – we always do. How can anyone say that? We are loaded with debt – the interest is doubling or tripling per year – and we, as a country, will be owing between 75 to 100 trillion in the near future. It will be impossible to pay. To me that translates into economic bondage forever. The bankers don’t have to laugh all the way to the bank – they never left.

“I AM SORRY I HAVE ONLY ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

By Warren Brooks to the Justice Times – 1989

Italics are mine – Frank Trejo – Yesterday’s News Today

Last month, President George Bush convened his Education Summit of state governors in Charlottesville, Va., but unless he is prepared to start a real revolution, the latest dismal decline in SAT scores will continue.

This fall, as American parents watched Marxist socialism take off its clothes and collapse in Eastern Europe, (it moved to our country) they cheerfully sent 41 million children back into the care of one of the most socialist enterprises in the Western World, that $180 billion near-monopoly known as U.S. public education. (the $180 is a pittance today)

Some years ago, I asked economist Milton Friedman why most American students still graduated from high schools not only with low performance but with such a socialistic perspective. As I remember it, his answer was characteristically clear:

“Because they are products of a socialist system. How can you expect such a system to inculcate the values of enterprise and competition, when it is based on monopoly state ownership?” (Federal government – 10^th Plank of Communist Manifesto)

Yet, how can a nation expect to compete in an increasingly dynamic global market, when its most important economic capital, its people, is the product of such a failed monopoly? (It is not a failed policy – they’ve succeeded in creating a “Generation of Idiots.”) How can merely extending choice within that monopoly really change it?

Despite the highest level of education spending (as a percent of gross national product) in the industrial world, this system is now graduating students who rank 13^th out of 13 advanced nations in science and math and 11^th in social studies and language. (90% of our people have never read the Constitution. Some failed policy)

The challenge facing would-be U.S. education reformers is no less daunting than what faces Lech Walesa in Poland’s similar quagmire. If they merely try to “reform” within our socialized system, their efforts will be, as Myron Lieberman warns in “Privatization and Educational Choice,” entirely “futilitarian.”

Socialist systems have failed not because of bad management, but because they failed to comprehend the true nature of wealth and of man, seeing both as primarily physical, finite and structural. Instead, of course, history and experience have taught us that wealth is primarily metaphysical, the product more of mind than of matter, and that man himself is primarily mental, spiritual and individual, not merely a physical component of a collective mass, class or institutional structure.

This alone explains why individual freedom combined with market capitalism has invariably produced greater economic growth, wealth and prosperity than collectivist (communistic) planning, because it has produced more real capital: Ideas.

Observe how the main stream media, the networks, Hollywood, academia, have vilified the capitalist system. Brainwashing the ignorant voters that capitalism is evil. When in reality it is the communists/socialists in government, especially those in the democratic party in Congress, that are the ones responsible for the economic chaos we are in. They are the danger to our liberties and freedoms. There are also a few hypocrite Republicans to blame. They had a great opportunity to distinguish themselves from democrats on the bail-outs but also participated in the ear-marks. To them I say – go to hell you bastards! What does this have to do with education Frank? I don’t know, I just got here.

This is truer today than ever before. Instead of man as a pawn within a mechanistic macro-economy, the economy is increasingly within the mind of man, making the individual the key to collective wealth. Unfortunately, since 1963, public education has been strongly a nation now in the battle of its life for survival in a world where, as George Gilder notes, “Knowledge is not merely a source of power. It is supremely the source of power.”

One of the nation’s leading productivity economists, John Kendrick, has long maintained that as much as 70% of output depends on “the knowledge factor,” our most essential capital. Last March, a scholarly study in the American Economic Review by John H. Bishop, a Cornell economist, confirmed Kendrick’s thesis. He showed that “Productivity growth and education test scores declined almost simultaneously.”

In the middle 1960s, Bishop found that general intellectual achievement (GIA) of students was rising about 5% per year., and productivity was rising about 3%. By 1980, GIA was falling at nearly 6% a year, and productivity growth was down to less than 0.5% per year. The direct economic costs of that lower knowledge trend (in 1987 dollars) was $34 billion in 1980, $86 billion in 1988, and a projected $334 billion in the year 2010. (I’m afraid to find out the cost now) And “If the forecasted shortfalls in output up to the year 2010 are cumulated… the total present discounted costs of the test score decline is $3.2 trillion.” This means, Bishop concludes in scholarly understatement, that “the effect of general intellectual achievement on wage rates and productivity is larger than heretofore believed.” Unless George Bush (the first) finds ways to reverse the centralizing and socializing trends that have killed our schools – and our economy – the United States will lose the competitive race in the 1990s.

To think, this and other warnings, were telling us the danger of losing control of our educational system to Communists way back in the 80s. But the same forces that were destroying it were telling us at the same time, we were the most informed and smartest people on the planet. And we believed it.

“I AM SORRY I HAVE ONLY ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”

By Claire Kelley for the Justice Times – 1986

Italics are mine – Frank Trejo – Yesterday’s News Today.

“Freedom of movement is basic in our scheme of values. The right to travel is a part of the ‘liberty’ of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v. Dulles, (1958) 357 US 116

Because there seems to be great resistance among Americans to those who are fighting traffic tickets and claiming the right to drive without driver’s licenses or license plates, this writer decided to do a column on the necessity of the preservation of that right, so as to impress upon those still asleep – even in the patriotic movement – the importance of this right and the correctness of maintaining vigilance against its destruction, by both state and federal government. (Recently a judge in Arizona found cameras installed by the state to ticket speeders on the freeway to be unconstitutional based upon the 6^th Amendment of YOUR CONSTITUTION. Paraphrasing – you must be confronted by your accuser)

In 1959, the U.S Supreme Court held:

“…a newspaperman’s right to travel is a part of freedom of the press.” Worthy v. Herter, (1959) 106 app. D.C. 153, 270 F.2d 905 at 908.

Without the right to travel, our First Amendment rights to redress our grievances with state or federal legislatures would be meaningless. We are at liberty to redress our grievances in any-law abiding manner we choose and are not necessarily limited to letters and phone calls.

If one wishes to appear and testify for a congressional or state legislative committee, one has that right – traveling to such a committee is a part of that right and we may choose whatever mode of travel suits our convenience. Also, the right to free exercise of religion would be meaningless without the freedom to travel to and from any place where one may choose to go in exercising that freedom.

As matters stand now, we cannot drive to and from church, bible study or any religious gatherings, without two state licenses; (1) car license plates and (2) a driver’s license. Free exercise means unencumbered in any way. Free according to Webster’s Dictionary means, not restricted and without cost. Both a driver’s license and license plates cost money and are restrictions.

If one cannot drive to one’s friends or to a social or political gathering without those two licenses, then our First Amendment right to freedom of association is infringed. If one cannot drive to work, he is deprived of his livelihood. If one cannot drive to the voting booth, he is disenfranchised. These are the very liberties we established government to protect, not to tax.

Furthermore, if our government servants can grant licenses to engage in the pursuits of life, liberty and happiness, then by denying these same licenses government can effectively deny these natural rights protected by the Constitution.

It is this writer’s firm belief that we do not need licenses to pursue life, liberty or happiness, which government was established to protect. The power to license is the power of life and death.

There is no greater piece of disinformation than the propaganda that driving is a privilege. Judges say it every day and MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) has taken it up as their foremost slogan.

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a Common Law, which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and posses property (everything that belongs to you – not only real estate) and to pursue happiness and safety.

“It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyance of the day and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon (Amish people) thereon, or to operate and automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.

“It is not a mere privilege, like a privilege of moving a house in the street, or of operating a business stand in the street, or of transporting persons or property for hire along the street, which a city may permit or prohibit at will. Smith v. Thompson, (1930) 154 SE 570.”

As Justice Goldberg pointed out in his concurring opinion in Griswold v. Conn. (1965) 381 US 479, our rights are not limited by the first Eight Amendments to the Constitution, but also include a myriad of unwritten, common law rights, under the Ninth Amendment.

(The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.)

The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the states from infringing on the right to travel, which is so essential to our pursuit of life, liberty and happiness.

In 1868, Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall. 35 recognized that freedom to travel to the capitol of the United States and throughout the country was a right of national citizenship and does not owe its existence to the federal government.

It has also been referred to by the courts, as a natural right. Schactman v Dulles, (1955) 96 APP D.C. 287. 225 F 2d 938 at 941.

The right to travel to travel by auto, pack mule, skate board or any other means, is a well- established common right, which is not created by a license.

“A license is essentially the granting of a special privilege to one or more persons, not enjoyed by the citizens generally, or, at least not enjoyed by a class of citizens to which the license belongs. A common right is not the creation of a license.” Adler v Whitbeck. 9 NE 672; Ohio 539. (My interpretation is that those that use the roads as a commercial entity- the ones that are licensed for business purposes – delivery trucks, semi-trucks, cabs, buses…and whatever, are the ones required to be licensed.)

Black’s Law Dictionary defines fraud as an intentional perversion of the truth in order to induce someone to surrender a legal right. Every time government officials, judges included, state that driving is a privilege, they are perpetuating a fraud upon the people they swore to serve. (This is the same with our Constitutional Republic when our system is referred to as a Democracy – especially by most politicians and presidents.)

Our history declares that matters of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are inalienable rights which cannot be taken away by which is exactly what the denial of a license does. Now, do you understand why those people fighting license laws deserve your respect instead of your contempt?

Our natural, inherent right to travel is protected by the First, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The right to travel is a basic part of our liberty, without which, life is not even possible.

Vigilance is indeed the price of liberty, but if you ridicule those who are being vigilant, don’t complain when there is no liberty left…end of article

Whenever you see someone carrying a poster (like I do) with any kind of message – give that person a thumbs up or honk your horn – we are out there exercising our First Amendment right, helping to preserved it for all of us.

Remember when President Bush referred to the minute men organization as “vigilantes”? This is how damaging the minds of our people have been affected by socialism. So much so, that they don’t even suspect – not even idiots like the former president.

One other tidbit. In Article 4 (not the amendment) Sec. 1 and 2 spell out your rights as you travel from one state to another, or in moving into another state. Whatever license you posses (driver’s, plates, hunting, fishing), they are good until they expire. But the bastards have passed Mickey Mouse laws to steal more of your money. It is illegal for them to force you to buy more licenses before the old ones expire.

The following article is relative:

Spokane, Washington – Constitutionalists Glenn R. Braunstein of Spokane has filed a suit directly in the Washington State Supreme Court, demanding that the court recognize driving is a right. Braunstein has asked the court to rule on the question of whether it’s a right or a privilege to drive on the state’s public streets and highways. The suit seeks to prohibit public employees from interfering with people who exercise their right to drive.

It is intended to set a precedent that other prosecutors in the state would be forced to follow, Braunstein said.

“This is a class action, literally for thousands of people both in and outside the state who wish to drive as a matter of right, who want their rights recognized by the state,” said Braunstein, who is a paralegal.

The suit represents the latest volley in the battle between patriots – members of a growing movement that contends the government is operating out side the Constitution. Their plan is to challenge unconstitutional laws in the court.

Braunstein and his wife, Julie Ann Port, suffered a setback recently when the state Court of Appeals in Spokane upheld a district court’s conviction on charges of no valid operator’s license and resisting arrest.

The appeals court agreed that the U.S. Constitution protects an individual’s right to travel, but it held that driving is a qualified right, or a privilege, because it is limited to certain class of individuals – generally those 16 years old and older who have passed an exam.

Braunstein said that he has learned of several other favorable rulings in other states that will be used in his state supreme court case.

In a Massachusetts ruling, he said, “the judge said we are right and there’s no jurisdiction of the court so the case was dismissed.”

If the action is successful in the Washington State Supreme Court, Braunstein said he would he will head directly for the state legislature and ask for legislation to protect the right to travel.

“The impact will be that you take the driver’s test one time and they won’t be able to make you pay for a new driver’s license every four years.

“That’s a tax, and the court has ruled that you can’t tax a right,” he said.

Working is also a right – not a privilege. This is why through the years people have fought the IRS because of a tax on your wages – which is unconstitutional. But even though there are Court rulings that say you can’t tax a right – government still does it. You know why? Because we are in economic bondage to the owners of the Federal Reserve – that is why the IRS commits crimes against our citizens to protect the scam. All elected officials are aware of this but are afraid of the IRS. Can you imagine. 535 elected reps, I president and 9 black robed thugs representing over 300 million people that have the law on their side and they are scared? Standing at an intersection with a poster that reads “I DIDN’T VOTE FOR SOCIALISM” an immigrant from Romania stopped and thanked me and said the world knows how stupid the American people were. How sad. We have the greatest document, next to the bible, and 90% haven’t read it. No wonder many go by and flip fingers at me.

“And the biggest impact of all is that they won’t be able to charge you an excise tax on your license plate. That will literally impact millions of dollars in state revenues,” he said.

“The excise tax, is a tax on a privilege and that’s why the state officials insist on calling driving a privilege so they can continue to levy the excise tax on it.”

Braunstein said he would eventually like to see the question taken to enough state courts to force the U.S Supreme Court to consider the matter.

Any time an elected official, in any capacity, violates your Constitution, that person should be thrown out of politics. We still have a slim chance to do what is right. The odds are against us. After all it took the socialists and communists almost 60 years to do it. The most damage being done to us in the school system. They are teaching our young the socialist way. They are truly the “ignorant generation.”

I AM SORRY I ONLY HAVE ONE BAT TO SWING FOR MY COUNTRY.”